User talk:JohnCWiesenthal

April 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to IntelliStar, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Please stop adding the Products section to the article. If you continue to do so, I will report you for edit-warring. Thank you.  --  Z L  Media '' 20:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to IntelliStar. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  --  Z L  Media  00:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  --  Z L  Media  00:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at IntelliStar. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Spike Wilbury (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

I have made your block indefinite only because you have thus far not shown any understanding that Wikipedia is a collaborative workspace where you must explain and discuss your edits when engaged by other editors. Continuing to add material to IntelliStar, without any sign that you understand why it's problematic or that other editors object, is an example of disruptive editing. Any admin may unblock you once you show some willingness to explain and discuss your edits. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

New message from Alexis Jazz
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § Spongebob Squarepants is now freely licensed!. &#x0020;This is a terrible idea. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Requested move for Twitter article

 * Simple Attention.svg Your opinion on this issue is requested

You have been tagged to this conversation because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views. 𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 23:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Re: Megalovania
I added a comment to that files for discussion that I believe is important to consider, please ping me with your response. Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)