User talk:JohnDoe2014

JohnDoe2014, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rohingya people, you may be blocked from editing. Peter&#160;James (talk) 15:58, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Peter&#160;James (talk) 16:01, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ali-al-Bakuvi (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Ali-al-Bakuvi (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Alexf(talk) 16:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Please note that your block has been extended to 72 hours for block evasion. Please sit out your block (or appeal it through the procedure stated above) and return to productive editing afterward. Continued attempts to circumvent the block on your original account will lead to longer blocks being placed on it. Thank you. Parsecboy (talk) 18:55, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * JohnDoe2014, the admin discussions of your edits took place at the edit warring noticeboard (permanent link) and at Sockpuppet Investigations. EdJohnston (talk) 15:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 17:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Rohingya people‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ali-al-Bakuvi (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Parsecboy (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)