User talk:JohnGormleyJG/Archive 1

TV guide
You do not seem to grasp the fact that Wikipedia is not a tv guide. Don't add stuff that's going to be inaccurate real soon, like air times and recent air dates. If you're going to add broadcast information, do it in such a way that it remains accurate in the long run and is relevant to the reader. People do not go look up Irish air times for this week's episode of The King of Queens on Wikipedia, so this is not relevant. --Atlan (talk) 14:16, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Infobox image sizes
Please stop setting infobox image sizes to 300px. Lead images should not be set to greater than 300px but when set to 300px they cause the infobox to exceed the 300px limit. This is why we normally set infonbox images to 220-275px. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 18:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:07, 4 May 2014 (UTC

Colour in television article infoboxes
Please do not change TV series infoboxes to use different colours to the default, a you did to Good Morning Britain (2014 TV programme). There is a long-standing consensus that only certain TV series are to use other than the default infobox colours. This is why the  and   are not documented at Infobox television. TV series that have been authorised to use other than the default infobox colouring are included in Template:Infobox television/colour. If you believe a TV series should use non-default colours, please gain consensus for that at Template talk:Infobox television/colour. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * How do I give these TV shows that function I think shows such as 24 should have it. User:JohnGormleyJG


 * As I've stated above, you need to gain consensus at Template talk:Infobox television/colour. You could also try discussing it at WT:TV but the consensus is that only very, very limited number of TV series can use colour and those series are generally only exempted from the consensus because they've used consistent colouring for a long time. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

24 character articles
Hi there, I'd really like to stop having to revert your edits on those 24 characters articles, but you keep undoing my edits, and it seems you have yet to read the Wikipedia guideline, WP:JUSTPLOT (plot-only summaries of fictional works), which is what Wikipedia is not. This is why outside wikis like the the 24 Wikia exists, to house this type of "in-universe" information. But, this is Wikipedia, articles need to have notable real-world information for them to exist. Unless you plan on expanding each of these articles beyond a plot summary (casting of the actor, writing and development of character, reception to character, etc.) and beyond what is already in the 24: Live Another Day article, then there is no reason for these articles to exist. I hope you understand. Thank you. Drovethrughosts (talk) 21:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry I posted the message on your talk page before I read this and is there any way we can get a seperate article for these characters without an editing war. I was trying to make this season the same as the others and other users can add in information regarding critical reception and casting afterwards I was just starting off these pages aware more info will be added and I feel there is no need to just undo all that useful information. Thank You JohnGormleyJG (talk) 21:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)JohnGormleyJG
 * This is both a response your comments here and on my talk page. I wouldn't call that information "useful", it's plot information about a fictional character (also, characters who have appeared in roughly a dozen TV episodes, not all that notable). Again, this is why 24 wikia exists. In respond to your comment, "If there's any extra information regarding critical reception, casting etc.you wish to include to make this a plausible article feel free to do so." That's not "extra" information, that's what should be the focus of the article, the real-world information. The burden isn't on me to add this information, as you're the one who wants them created. If you want them to exist, then they must be done properly and not just contain a plot summary. The article for Kate Morgan existed for over 3 months, but no real-world information was added in that time. The articles need to contain substantial real-world information (along with several references establishing notability, not just a link to a blog website like 24spoilers.com for example) enough to justify a standalone article. Drovethrughosts (talk) 21:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Almost all the characters that have their own article do NOT include real world information take for example Milo seasons 1 and 6 all information is just plot summary this is wit most of the characters and I presumed it should be with the characters from LAD thank you JohnGormleyJG (talk) 22:00, 25 July 2014 (UTC)JohnGormleyJG


 * Read Other stuff exists. Not the best rationale to create these article. Rules and guidelines regarding these types of articles have become stricter over the years, we shouldn't continue piling onto the list of plot-only articles that are against Wikipedia's guidelines. What's been stated isn't my opinion, it's a Wikipedia guideline. Respect that. Drovethrughosts (talk) 22:28, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Ok thanks for clearing that up should we leave those older articles from past seasons alone or redirect them also. Thank you JohnGormleyJG (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)JohnGormleyJG


 * Thanks for understanding. As for the other issue, that's a pretty big thing, to redirect over a dozens articles that have been in place for years. That's not a unique issue to 24, there's several TV series' with characters articles or other related articles that could and should be redirected due to the plot-only nature of them, but that's something that should be handled by several editors after discussing the issues. I simply redirected these because they were newer, and I just wanted to stop the continued creation of these types of "plot-only" articles that would eventually probably just get redirected or get tagged with various Wikipedia clean-up tags, like Kim Bauer. Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Four Rooms episodes, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As I indicated in my edit summary, the source used is not a verified Twitter account, so it does not constitute a reliable source and therefore cannot be used as a reference.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This is a dealer from the shows real Twitter. He would know when the show is returning unless you have information that this is false the edit stays.JohnGormleyJG (talk) 16:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)JohnGormleyJG
 * As I have indicated above, the fact that the source is not a verified Twitter account means that it is not considered to be a reliable source and therefore cannot be used as a reference. Only verified Twitter accounts can be used as sources. Note that edit-warring over this is inappropriate and could lead to a block. Bold declarations like "the edit stays" demonstrates an assertion of ownership over the article and is similarly inappropriate. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Edit-warring warning
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at List of Four Rooms episodes. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

''Please note that you have already made 3 reverts in the past 7 hours, so you are at 3RR now. Another revert will result in a 3RR breach.''  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * What is 3RR breachJohnGormleyJG (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC)JohnGormleyJG


 * The three-revert rule is referred to as 3RR. Making 4 reverts in a 24-hour period is a 3RR breach. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:36, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:How I Met Your Mother The Whole Story Seasons 1-9 DVD.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:How I Met Your Mother The Whole Story Seasons 1-9 DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Four Rooms episodes, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As I indicated in my edit summary, the source used is not a verified Twitter account, so it does not constitute a reliable source and therefore cannot be used as a reference.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This is a dealer from the shows real Twitter. He would know when the show is returning unless you have information that this is false the edit stays.JohnGormleyJG (talk) 16:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)JohnGormleyJG
 * As I have indicated above, the fact that the source is not a verified Twitter account means that it is not considered to be a reliable source and therefore cannot be used as a reference. Only verified Twitter accounts can be used as sources. Note that edit-warring over this is inappropriate and could lead to a block. Bold declarations like "the edit stays" demonstrates an assertion of ownership over the article and is similarly inappropriate. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Edit-warring warning
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at List of Four Rooms episodes. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

''Please note that you have already made 3 reverts in the past 7 hours, so you are at 3RR now. Another revert will result in a 3RR breach.''  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * What is 3RR breachJohnGormleyJG (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC)JohnGormleyJG


 * The three-revert rule is referred to as 3RR. Making 4 reverts in a 24-hour period is a 3RR breach. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:36, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:How I Met Your Mother The Whole Story Seasons 1-9 DVD.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:How I Met Your Mother The Whole Story Seasons 1-9 DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

TV article infoboxes
Please do not continue to add bgcolour and/or colour text to TV article infoboxes. These parameters no longer exist Infobox television and therefore serve no purpose. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * When did they stop?JohnGormleyJG (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * They were removed two hours ago. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * How come The Simpsons still have it?JohnGormleyJG (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * As I explained here at the beginning of July, only certain TV series are permitted to use other than the default infobox colours. The Simpsons is one of the fifteen permitted programs. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 18:04, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Just out of interest what are the others?JohnGormleyJG (talk) 21:24, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * They can be seen by looking at the source for Template:Infobox television/colour (which I linked to in the last discussion). They are:
 * Angel
 * Buffy the Vampire Slayer
 * Chuck
 * Entourage
 * Firefly
 * Futurama
 * House
 * Mad Men
 * Sex and the City
 * The 4400
 * The O.C.
 * The Simpsons
 * The Sopranos
 * The X-Files
 * Veronica Mars
 * -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 05:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * How did those shows get the code? JohnGormleyJG (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Your recent editing history at Good Morning Britain (2014 TV programme) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:23, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Regarding this edit summary, it makes no difference if nobody objected. The parameters have been deprecated for years and should not be used, per consensus. They no longer even exist in Infobox television so adding them serves no purpose, as they don't do anything. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Admin Help
✅ 

Help Me
✅ Dear User I am inquiring where is it possible for myself to become an admin I am aware there is a request form but am not sure where to find it. Thanks for your help JohnGormleyJG (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Try Request for Adminship- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Four Rooms (TV series)
Hi JohnGormleyJG, I'd like to make some comments regarding this edit: section titles should not be bolded or contain links per the Manual of Style (MOS:BOLD, MOS:HEADINGS), the bios of the people listed are copied directly from the source which is a copyright violation, and the references being used are bare references (just the url). Please look at Template:Cite web as to how to fully fill out a citation. Hopefully you find my comment helpful, and not annoying. Just let me know. :) Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your help and sorry I was unaware that headings could not be bloded. Would you like me to undo that edit. Thanks again for the help. This way I can improve as an editor. :)JohnGormleyJG (talk) 14:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, section and subsection titles are automatically bolded, so it's unnecessary. Also remove the wikilinks, instead wikilink their names below. The addition seems redundant of the above section titled "Dealers", so maybe merge the content together. And "Current" is not a good section title, as it's unclear of what it's referring to. Also, please be aware of WP:COPYVIO, this is very important. But yes, I would make changes to correct the errors. Drovethrughosts (talk) 15:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * It has been removed now thanks for your help JohnGormleyJG (talk) 16:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)


 * P.S. I would like you opinion on this situation. This article Good Morning Britain presenters and reporters there use to be a table layout used for this which you can see in the past revisions but has been changed to a list. All other news reporters such as ITV News uses a table. What is your take on this. I also mentioned it in the talk page of the article. Thank You JohnGormleyJG (talk) 15:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Tables vs. lists, it's all down to preference. It's just a different way of displaying the same information. It should be noted that just because tables look "fancier" or are able to use colour is not a good rationale for their use. It should be based on practicality and if the information is better served in a table format. So it's down to editor consensus, see what the others think. Drovethrughosts (talk) 15:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Final ratings
The ratings you provided for the series finale of Two and a Half Men are not the final ratings but the preliminary ratings. Preliminary ratings are almost never accurate and are almost always adjusted when the preliminary ratings are released. Preliminary ratings are usually published around 9:30 am PT, while final ratings are usually released by mid-afternoon. Davejohnsan (talk) 20:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arthur & George (TV Series)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Arthur & George (TV Series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &mdash;  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 14:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: The dress
Any website can put up a poll. But that does not mean that an otherwise unremarkable poll needs to be specifically singled out with that much weight placed on it in the presentation. The BuzzFeed poll is notable primarily because it was BuzzFeed that helped further spread awareness of this phenomenon, but it also does not need to be weighted so heavily in the presentation. ViperSnake151  Talk  23:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Ant and Dec.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ant and Dec.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 94.6.178.175 (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 94.6.178.175 (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Reply
It's not constructive, and doesn't make sense. I made two HIMYM user boxes: one with a Barney quote ("This user is legend- wait for it- dary!") and an alternate one in reference to Ted ("This user is looking for the one"). Adding True Story to that doesn't make sense. I don't want to violate 3RR, so please revert your edit. Rusted AutoParts 22:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes I will revert

 John Gormley J G  ( ✉ ) 22:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

List of Gogglebox Episodes
Hi, just to ask why shouldn't we include +1 in the ratings for gogglebox as they do make quite a difference! Most other shows use +1 information on wikipedia, why not this one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simkinsjohn1 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Simkinsjohn1 thanks for comment, + 1 is only included if there is a grid specific for ratings such as on Ant & Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway there is also HD and share% included in that. With the Gogglebox episodes it is mainly based on the episodes and has the key features air date/episode number/viewers and BARB only source standard Channel 4. Plus standard gets higher priority over +1 included and if we were to include all this information the page would be too crowded. Thank You  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ ) 15:12, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Reviewer and rollbacker
Hello JohnGormleyJG. Your account has been granted the "rollback" and "reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.


 * Rollback user right
 * Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin).


 * Pending changes reviewer user right
 * The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing.
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes.
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! S warm  X  00:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank You  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ ) 06:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

can i be an admin?
can you please make me an admin? i love to make wikipedia even better. thanks for your help.Lakerfan45 (talk) 07:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello User:Lakerfan45, first of all I am not an admin myself it takes a lot of work to become one. I would recommend trying to become a rollback or a reviewer first to build up to becoming a admin. For rollback rights request form click HERE and for becoming a reviewer click HERE. Also I would recommend you create your user page, you can do that by simply clicking on your username in red at the top right hand corner. Check out my userpage if you need help or want a few tips. Thank You  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ ) 07:58, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Better Call Saul Episode 3 Title Card.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Better Call Saul Episode 3 Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Reply
It's not an WP:OWN issue in the slightest. The Infobox itself already contains a quote from the show, it doesn't need another one. If you want an Infobox with "True Story" in it, then ill make one if you want. Rusted AutoParts 20:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * . Rusted AutoParts 20:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ ) 20:34, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited My Name Is Earl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Garcia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Removing DVD info from infobox
Hey JohnGormleyJG, just a reminder, when you remove the DVD info from the infoboxes, sometimes you're deleting references that are later used in the article, thus causing a cite error (examples: ). I'd move the references (if needed) instead of just straight-up deleting them. Drovethrughosts (talk) 14:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi thanks for letting me know that. I was just doing it quite quickly to get through the seasons and didn't notice that. I will go back and try fix them thanks again.  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  14:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ITV NEWS LOGO.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ITV NEWS LOGO.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Files listed for deletion
Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Files for deletion/2015 June 11 if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. Kharkiv07 ( T ) 23:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * File:John Gormley JG Talk.png
 * File:JohnGormleyJG Contact.png
 * File:JohnGormleyJG Created Pages.png
 * File:JohnGormleyJG Userboxes.png
 * File:JohnGormleyJG Introduction Image.png
 * File:JohnGormleyJGlogo2015.png

Can you help?
Hello. Could you help with a couple of I.P.s on WVEE & WPGC-FM? They keep reverting my edits of removing non-notable people. I believe it is the same person; I have given them an explanation here. Thanks. Corkythe  hornetfan  21:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, thanks for coming here, I will look into that now and will get back to you ASAP. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  21:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Don't be surprised if they revert your edits. Corkythe   hornetfan  21:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey, just looked over that and you are definitely right acc. to Wikipedia's policy and guidelines. I gave them a final edit warn. I also noticed they had gotten several edit wars in the past. If they continue to revert they will likely get blocked. What they are saying is too trivia which is against WP:IINFO. I added those pages to my watchlist and I am keeping a eye on them, so I will be checking the reverts. Thank You --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  21:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Don't threaten me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.82.136.2 (talk) 19:28, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry what are you referring to? --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  19:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Most likely this warning posted to the IP user’s talk page. They are simply overreacting to standard reversions and resultant warnings. --SpyMagician (talk) 20:05, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * That was not their first warning, they were edit warned MANY times in the past and in the edit summary. Do you expect me just to give the first level warning for each page they disrupt. As of overreacting I think saying "Do not threaten me. Posting threats on the internet can be considered a federal crime" is overreacting. They do not own Wikipedia and cannot have it they way they choose. When given policy based reasons they need to comply with that or discuss if they still believe they are right. These were edit warnings not threats --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  20:19, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe you should reread what I wrote: I simply explained what might have caused their overreactions. Your responses have been 100% correct and I am not in disagreement; the user using 65.82.136.2 is apparently delusional. --SpyMagician (talk) 20:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh I apologies, English is not my strong point. I am more a Maths and Physics person. Sorry for the mistake. Thanks --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  20:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

DL destinations at Atlanta Airport
All the international destinations listed require multiple stops at DL hubs (also Delta does not even serve Melbourne, Australia). 97.85.113.113 (talk) 00:37, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey I was unaware you were reverting something else. When I was reviewing the pending change I saw it was unrefferenced, I don't know much about flights myself so I am aware I could have made a mistake. I was just checking for vandalism --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  08:29, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! No problem. Another editor already undid it. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 05:31, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Archiving
After looking at your archives, it seems all will fit easily in one archive page so I've taken the liberty of consolidating everything into one archive for you and tweaked the setup accordingly. As a result, archives 2 & 3 are now empty. All should work OK now but if you want me to revert, let me know. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 05:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thats grand thanks. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  05:06, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

deleted information on SD Compostela
Hi, you deleted the data and information I add to the english wiki of football club SD Compostela. Why did you delete it? I only added the last season information. I did not delete anything.

RSQ25 (talk) 14:48, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Hey, I am not quite sure what you are referring too. As I have been quite busy editing recently. Normally if I remove something it is because it is not properly sourced or does not fit the Wikipedia Guidelines. If you believe you gave a reliable source and did think I made a mistake then I apologise. Do you mind linking me to this edit you are referring too? Thanks --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  14:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Gino Polli

 * Hello John, it is not so, I removed the notification, because as you see have been added integrations with the references required. I therefore should eliminate related note, thank you.Obviously, what has been reported in the talk page.I would ask you, please, then to remove the note on the data are very clear. thanks again.

--79.31.160.212 (talk) 15:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Thing
Not sure why you reverted this, as your edit summary does not appear to make sense: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thing_(comics)&diff=668293746&oldid=668292387 65.126.152.254 (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Ben Roberts
Hi,

I edited the page to reflect his move to Brighton and Hove Albion. The only information I removed was the line 'Thus far, his ability to procure and nurture inexperienced talent, together with innovative training methods and analytical research have seen him described as one of the best young coaches in the game.'

The page is now back to a version that says he is coach at charlton. This is incorrect. If you could revert it to the page I created (with the addition of that line) that would be great. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.129.65 (talk) 14:30, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Hey, Ill check that out. I was using Huggle, to revert vandalism/content not containing reliable sources. I apologise if I made a mistake. I will recheck over that for you now and get back to you. Thanks --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  14:33, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Hey, I just looked over that and noticed you made some vast changes and did not include refferences. By all means you can restore that version but please include some references for verification. Thanks --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  14:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you I shall do so and will find more references for the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.129.65 (talk) 14:42, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * No prob! Happy Editing :) --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  14:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your assistance, I hope the page is to the correct standard now (it certainly looks like many footballer profiles I have read before). Ben Roberts (footballer). I think the previous creator of the page must have been a Middlesbrough fan haha! All the best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.129.65 (talk) 15:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * No Prob! --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  18:31, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

ICC World T20 Qualifier Champions
Hi John I'm not all that familiar with how wikipedia works, All I know is that UAE WERE NOT ICC World Twenty20 Qualifier Champions in 2010 and 2013

2010 Afghanistan won and Ireland in 2013

Here is the source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICC_World_Twenty20_Qualifier and the various ESPN Cricinfo pages

Perhaps check your facts before telling me off for correcting an error

Regards Lawrie Colliver — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.166.239.94 (talk) 01:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Rugby Europe 7s in Gdańsk
Hi,

You made a mistake in calculating Cyprus's point difference. They ended the group stage with +50 point difference, but you put down that they scored 93 and conceded 37 or 38, which would give them a different point difference. They had +50, and it went down to who got more points (had they been level on small points they still would have gone through as Ukraine had more yellow cards).

Sorry for not mmentioning the changes properly, I was sure I commented those changes.

best regards,

Antoni — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.77.144.123 (talk) 18:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Bishopsgate Bombing Article
Hi John,

I'm unclear what information you believe to be incorrect, or what is wrong with the citations I provided:

Tensions in London ran even higher with the approach of 23 April St George's Day in England -- the Friday preceding the bombing -- due also in part to three previous IRA-related bombings in England that year: the two Warrington bomb attacks on 20 March and a bomb attack outside of Harrods on 28 January. Although another bombing attack in London was not unexpected with threats "every night, virtually", the location so close to the Baltic Exchange bombing was.

Thanks,

~Graham

Litany42 (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Bump — Preceding unsigned comment added by Litany42 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

article meesdorf
hi john,

the unknown ip that changed content, was me.

i hope you understood the reason. i was in a hurry.

thanks

--Rm1911 (talk) 15:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Thats fine, so sorry for the delay I was away last week. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  07:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Goodbye to Language review
Hello, I would like you to please reverse your quick fail of the nomination. Firstly, it is not uncommon for articles to be given time to address any issues. Secondly, you are mistaken on a few of your assessments. It is not necessary to have references in the lead or a syopsis. The lead summarizes the entire article and therefore all references are in the body of the article. Honestly, I would just like a second opinion. You may notice that it already passed a "Did you know..." review and the issues that you brought up were not mentioned.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 00:36, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Forget it. I'll just relist it.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 00:42, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

24 Featured article nomination?
Spotted that you may have nominated 24 (TV series) for FA? Was this a mistake? Steven  Zhang  Help resolve disputes!  23:44, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * That was correct. I did nominate it. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  12:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't see that the FAC was opened (so I removed it - I added here removed the last bit about contribs to the article, I saw your changes to the article just now). If it does go ahead, please let me know - I'm not sure it's within the spirit of the process to nominate and take credit for an article you've only made a few changes to - it's largely unchanged from when it became a good article when I got it to this version . I don't mean to be OWNy, but I worked rather hard on the article (I'm the top contributor to it) so just want to ensure credit is shared fairly. Steven   Zhang  Help resolve disputes!  17:32, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

A vandal-warning by you has been used in a Phabricator-task
For your information; One of your edit has been used in a Huggle-related-bug report on Phabricator. (t) Josve05a  (c) 08:25, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

hi am alex
I am extremely sorry on what happened I guess it was just a mistake,I just wanted to know if mating season is a universal season for all dogs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A03:2880:3010:6FF3:FACE:B00C:0:1 (talk) 05:58, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

hi it's alex
Dude can you please research on doxiepoo's that's my favorite dog — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A03:2880:3010:6FF7:FACE:B00C:0:1 (talk) 14:06, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * sorry who is this? --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  19:39, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Pirates of the Caribbean (film series) rejection
Hi John,

I am a new user who submitted a fix for the Pirates of the Caribbean (film series) wiki entry, but my requested minor adjustment was rejected.

In trying to get use to the code structuring I sent in 5 revisions, so I want to apologize for that. Is there a way I can find out why my edit was rejected, and how to get my change approved?

Angelasteph (talk) 17:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello the reference you included was removing a previous one put in by another user. Deadline is a more well known and established company than telltales. We generally try to keep the references by a more reliable source to be sure the facts are correct. Thankyou. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  18:23, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

autopatrol
hi, it states that i got patrolled. does this indicate, you like to give me autpatrol right? --Rm1911 (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It just means your page got patrolled. You can mark a new page as patrolled if you scroll down to the bottom and mark it. However you cannot mark pages you created. Thanks --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  09:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * thanks, so i can use the AUTOPATROL template on my user page? (the little green sign on the top-right)--Rm1911 (talk) 09:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Tunisian Arabic
Dear User,

Tunisian Arabic has been nominated for Wikipedia GA Status. However, no one has reviewed it. So, please review it soon.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Hey, the article you mentioned is not the style of articles I review. I normally review articles that I have some knowledge on how the article should be. For me it is Television/Film. Thank You --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  17:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Good Morning britain Presenters
John GormleyJG : Stapleton first appeared on 13 May 2014, so he should be at top, whilst Garraway first appeared on 15 May and Singh first appeared on 16 May, Fletcher first appeared as a newsreader on 16 February 2015. Garraway no longer is a newsreader and Singh is no longer an anchor, this was only while Hawkins was away, but Garraway is currently acting anchor. Bob N1C2 - 12.42 - 30/07/2015 Bob N1C2 (talk) 11:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * It is not based off when they appear. It is based off where they are credited. I dont mean to sound rude but the way I had it listed is the correct way and how it should be done. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  11:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Do you mean alphabetical or most appearances, also should Emmerdale Week be mentioned on Good Morning Britain presenters page or not, Kevin Hughes and Laura Tobin will be there, should Hughes be added to guest presenters/reporters list and Paul Brand is still appearing aswell. Bob N1C2 (talk) "'" 15.28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup - Round 2
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:52, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

ITV News at Ten
Please refrain from adding "related" programmes in the infobox of this and other ITV News bulletin articles - these other programmes are linked and readily available in the ITV News template. Infoboxes should be clean and concise rather than waffly.  LBM  talk to me  20:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The template is not officially part of the article, it is an addition. All related shows (remakes, spin-offs and adaptions) should be included in the infobox, The presenters are listed in both as should the related shows be. Thankyou
 * By that logic, the infobox isn't "officially" part of an article either. Please don't create excuses for adding trivial details - there are no remakes, spin-offs or 'adaptions' of news bulletins. See WP:MISC -  LBM  talk to me  21:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The infobox is actually part of the article. The template is a template on its own article and can be added to any article. Also a lot of people don't look at the templates they just look at the infobox and I can't see a valid reason as to why this should not be included. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  21:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a generally accepted convention that only one or two very notable "related" programmes go in the infobox. You keep adding a list of several other programmes which make the infoboxes look cluttered. If people want to visit articles for other programmes, then they will do so of their own accord. A mass list of other shows would probably put them off, if anything else. -  LBM  talk to me  21:14, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3
Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Good articles by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Film Assessment
There are some films waiting for assessment in WikiProject Film/Assessment. Please consider. --106.66.180.39 (talk) 13:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Deal or No Deal (UK game show)
Please stop removing references from this article. Although a reference is not required, removing a reference that is already included is not action that should be taken per WP:V. Also, the episode counts for each season are not referenced. Although an episode has aired, there is no source stating that the number of episodes listed actually aired, while some weeks aired reruns or skipped episodes altogether. AldezD (talk) 17:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * References are added for upcoming episodes and then must be removed once the episode has aired. References are kept for exceptional circumstances which are for other features of an overview box eg home media releases. Thank You --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  18:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * This does not address the lack of reference issue in relation to the episode count. Again, references should not be removed if they provide verification of the details listed in the table, and removing the references is not in agreement with WP:V, WP:PLOT, WP:EPISODE, nor WP:TV. It has also not been a practice within the Deal or No Deal (UK game show) article to remove references to season start/end dates and episode counts once an episode has aired. AldezD (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Line ups
Could I ask you why you've deleted series 19 and series 20 cast lists that some of us have put hard work into doing them for the past year. JJloose (talk) 00:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I deleted it as it did not fit the guidelines WP:FANCRUFT, WP:IINFO & WP:NOTTVGUIDE. I really appreciate the work that was put into this. But this is not a TV Guide website it is an encyclopedia and that knowledge is too trivia. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  21:11, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Consensus discussion on Agents of SHIELD (Season 2)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 04:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Update on the merge request
Should we go ahead and close this? It has been a more than a month and has two supports, no oppositions. Usually it is closed by now, and I forgot about it. I don't know how to do the "whole closing a discussion" thing, so if you know how I'd say go for it and merge this sucker. If you don't, I'll go ahead request an administrator do it. Corkythe hornetfan  22:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes I would say just go and merge it as it will be the same outcome. Nobody has objected. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  07:18, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Line ups
Do you still have all the lists? So I can make my own website for this but I need all the line ups that you took down :) JJloose (talk) 00:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

I mean for example the tables that has Monday and the underneath had Ruth Langsford etc etc and it was on for series 19 cast list and a series 20 one until you deleted them :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJloose (talk • contribs) 20:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * They can be found in the page history. :) --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  21:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

List of Loose Women Presenters table
Could I please bring this table back in, as me and several other editors have worked hard on this, as other editors and myself of this page are quite annoyed of your constant disruptive edits of this.

User talk:Bob N1C2 Bob N1C2 (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I understand your frustration, but as per the Wikipedia guidelines this type of Fancruft material is not permitted on the site. I strongly appreciate your time put into this but it is too trivia. I never watch Loose Women so I never noticed it before until you pointed it out to me on the GMB page where this is also non-permitted. Regardless even if it was not Fancruft it would be still removed as it is all self-research and not referenced. That is what makes it impossible to maintain. This only applies to a certain group of fans of the show. If you wish create a Loose Woman Wikia. Thank You --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  10:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Can I just add why do you say "this but it is too trivia" when it's not hard to understand and it helps Wikipedia editors like yourself and myself who edit that page regularly to categorise panelists in to which seat they sit in, the amount of appearances, etc (User talk:Bob N1C2)'''13.22, 27 October 2015 —Preceding undated comment added 13:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Trivia information is non-encyclopedic that more falls into the TV Guide category of trivia. It only applies to a certain group of fans and the article is a list of the presenters not a TV Guide of the show. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  14:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Well youre right it no longer needs to be on wikia as, there is now a forum of TV guides of presenters, p.s. Could you please leave the bit where it's says John Stapleton : 13 May 2014 - 22 July 2015 as I have researched it. Thank you User talk: Bob N1C2 —Preceding undated comment added 16:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Fiji national football team
Hi mate, you reverted my change on the Fiji National football team page, if you look at the fixtures and results, they played American Samoa on the 27th August, so it should read caps and goals updated after game against American Samoa.

Cheers
 * Sorry, if I made an error all I was really looking for was a reference. --  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  14:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Good Morning Britain
Seeing as you seem to have an attachment to this particular article, I suggest you take a close look at the diffs and see what content was added, replaced or moved: no presenters were added nor removed from the infobox in my edit. Please do not revert entire edits without taking into account the contributions of other Wikipedia users - this is extremely basic policy and acting with the civil attitude that is expected of you. I'd advise you to refrain from entering into arguments with other users about a trivial listing of television presenters. If you are so hellbent on the inclusion of a full list, then feel free to edit the article and add/remove names at will - but reverting entire edits (which includes restoring references and rewording weasel words into proper English within numerous sections of an article) demonstrates particularly poor judgement.  LBM  talk to me  23:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * As per your comments on my talk page:
 * Follow Up, It was not your edit I was reverting.
 * ...so why did you revert my edit?
 * Another editor removed some of the presenters from the infobox.
 * Yes, that is correct.
 * However your edit still contained those changes so I had to restore the last viable option.
 * No, you didn't. Simply editing the article and re-adding those presenter names is all that was required. Going for the easy option and clicking 'undo' is a very careless thing to do for the type of edit you wanted to make.  LBM  talk to me  23:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * , I don't really think terms such as hellbent are really fair, because after all these are the Wikipedia guidelines on based how the article should be written.--  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  23:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Find me a specific guideline or policy stating that Wikipedia editors are encouraged to list only certain presenters for tenuous reasons that make sense only to them rather than simply provide one succinct, clearly understandable and recognisable list of current presenters in the infobox, be it main, relief or both. (NB: there is a distinct difference between the 'cast' of a sitcom or entertainment show and the 'presenters' of a news broadcast.)  LBM  talk to me  05:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)


 * MOS:TV, applies to all cast/presenters/judges--  John Gormley J G  ( ✉ )  19:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

File:HIMYM Pilot Blue French Horn.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HIMYM Pilot Blue French Horn.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:00, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

File:How I Met Your Mother Blue French Horn Last Forever.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:How I Met Your Mother Blue French Horn Last Forever.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ITV NEWS LOGO.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ITV NEWS LOGO.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)