User talk:JohnK3142

Requested move of Draft:BabylonJS
Please see my comment at WP:RMTR: here. The move should be requested again if a decision is made to create an article in main space. The move has opposition, and the script is not letting me open a move discussion for a draft. Consider working to resolve the objections. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 01:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
Hololite – Athaenara ✉  21:36, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 * As per portions of this user's explanation in the unblock request below, I de-activated the sockpuppet template. – Athaenara  ✉  07:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Athaenara ✉  21:38, 11 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Two comments: (1) You may find "it was never my intention to become a general editor of Wikipedia" (quoting you above) an issue when your unblock request is addressed by another admin.  (2) I blocked Hololite three minutes before I blocked you.  – Athaenara  ✉  10:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Reply To (1): So from the beginning I have been naive in believing that an article was judged on content based on a set of given criteria for the content. Instead it turns out that there is a further judgement made on the type of contributor you are. So you can be the type of contributor (E) that values an entity, knows about an entity is able to write about an entity and expects to be judged on the quality of the article and the notability of the entity and willing to improve the article to in terms of quality and provide evidence of notability and instead is blocked. Whereas the other type of contributor (S) is one who is good at and likes writing and editing and can exercise this skill by editing many pages who finds an entity to write about and will only be judged on content. Now I agree that type (S) is vital to Wikipedia to ensure the quality of its pages and does need to consider and judge submissions and I also think that making a judgement on the article because the contributor is type (E) is dangerous ground. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnK3142 (talk • contribs) 11:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Userspace draft page
Well, shoot, that was undone in a hurry: moved it back into draft space. If I were you, I'd ask Dodger67 about moving it back into your userspace and sorting out the templates so it's clearly identified as a userspace draft. – Athaenara ✉  20:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


 * When a draft is submitted to AFC for review it is moved to draftspace, unless it is summarily declined for one of the "quick fail" reasons. So, if you wish to continue working on the draft do not submit it, you waste both your time, the reviewers time and it unneccessarily adds to the already long backlog. Only submit the draft when you actually want it to be reviewed. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


 * (I assume by "you" you mean "one", as it's pretty clear I am not writing a page about babylon.js.) I think the problem was that I didn't remove templates identifying the page as belonging in the draft space, and I think those should be removed and it should be put back into this user's space.  As I don't work in AfC (articles for creation) areas I'm unfamiliar with the technical niceties of managing that space and did not see what should obviously have been removed.  If this motivated user with a very narrow focus of interest can work on it in draft space until it's acceptable in mainspace as it is on the French and Russian language wikipedias, then there's no need to put it back in his userspace, all well and good. – Athaenara  ✉  21:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BabylonJS has been accepted
 BabylonJS, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:56, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=BabylonJS help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Babylon.js has been accepted
 Babylon.js, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Babylon.js help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.