User talk:JohnKoziar

Please be mindful odf WP:3RR
Greetings John,

For whatever reason you seem to be very passionate about the edits you want to see in Upper Canada College - and passion is just fine. But repeatedly reinserting edits that don't match consensus is not. You have now done so four or so times over the last few days, and while WP:3RR might use 3 reverts as a rough guideline for editwarring I'd remind you that WP:1RR applies - and editwarring is something to avoid no matter how many reverts are involved. Your tagging of the article as having WP:NPOV issues is disputed and you are the only current editor who is holding this position. Please cease these WP:POINTed edits and take it to talk. Simonm223 (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Upper Canada College
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Upper Canada College. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.

You've reached three reverts within the 24 hour time frame. -- Ħ   MIESIANIACAL  20:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)