User talk:JohnLynch

Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and stick around. If you want, you can drop us a note at New user log to introduce yourself.

Before you start doing a lot of editing, you'll want to take the Tutorial. It gives all the basic info you'll need as you start contributing.

You can sign your name on talk pages by using " " for your username and " ~ " for your username and a timestamp.

If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Help desk. You can also drop me a question on my talk page.

Happy editing, Isomorphic 02:44, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Hi, just wanted to say thankyou. I guess I probably should go and look at the tutorial ;) I was actually in the process of writing up an article when I saw this. Thanks for the help --John Lynch 02:50, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)

WikiProject Sydney
Want to join? I'm still formulating policy. Incidently, there is a message board Australian wikipedians' notice board - Ta bu shi da yu 06:09, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Review request
Hi :) If you have a few minutes it be great if you could have a look at West Papua and the re-name proposal at the bottom of its discussion page. Any input, edits, opinions, style be great. I've always tried to ensure there was an abundance of supporting evidence before adding content, and avoid emotive wording; I welcome different opinions, just wish they would explain what it is they disagree with. All Best :)Daeron 17:32, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Otherspace and Able Baker AfD
JohnLynch, Just as a general guideline, it's a bad idea to provide examples like this one, e.g. "You can't suggest that we delete X when we have Y". The result is often that people involved in the discussion will see it as an invitation to nominate the second article for deletion. And, if you've followed any discussions of MUDs on AfD, the outcome would be grim if you couldn't cite a source. brenneman (t) (c) 00:17, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Which is partly why I decided to offer that example. I've been turned off Wikipedia because of it's tendency to delete articles which (for anyone familiar with said community) would be ridiculous. If I incite even more deletions, then I hope it will only further demonstrate the point that perhaps there is something wrong with the criteria in which articles are being deleted. If and when Otherspace is put up for AFD and I notice it, I'll go and put a comparison with yet another article which shouldn't be deleted (but which cannot be verified by sources except those that have been deemed invalid for... well no good reason in my opinion). After enough times I hope to get a policy change as I feel this is hurting Wikipedia much more then it is helping it. I specifically chose Otherspace because it is in the exact same boat as Able and Baker. --John Lynch 00:23, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Ahh, the poison pawn gambit. Just for the record, I have no problem with someone, anyone, attempting to re-shape the foundational structures of Wikipedia.  It's simply that, as they currently exist, the policies and guidelines do pretty much exclude things that are only known to their respective communities.
 * Your "notability is not requirement" argument is a very good one. Which is why, in my evilness, I've chosen not to argue that!
 * If you do decide to immerse yourself in the whole deletion/inclusion madness, I'd look to users like Kappa and Encephalon. They are almost unfailingly polite, thoughtful, and as a result, respected.  The rest of us are hysterical shrieking ninnies.  brenneman (t) (c)  03:47, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello JohnLynch! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ryan Miller (author) -

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a classical music edit-a-thon Saturday week (13 October) in Sydney. The theme will be Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown between 8-14 October. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online during the countdown. Details an attendee list are at Meetup/Sydney/October 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a disability edit-a-thon Saturday week (10 November) in Sydney. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online before, during and after the meetup. Details an attendee list are at Meetup/Sydney/November 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 15:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney meetup invitation: January 2013
Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Thursday 10 January 2013. Details an attendee list are at Meetup/Sydney/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney September 2013 edit-a-thon invite
Hi there! You are cordially invited to an edit-a-thon this Saturday (21 September) in Sydney at the State Library of New South Wales (SLNSW), where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians throughout the day. Andy Carr, a senior librarian at SLNSW will also be helping out. The theme of the edit-a-thon is paralympics sports, but you are free to come along to meet other wiki contributors, and edit other topics.

If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online. Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Sydney/September 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Wikipedians in Sydney)

Invitation
There is a backstage pass coming up to be followed by an editathon in the State Library of New South Wales on 23 November. This is the first time that an Australian cultural institution has opened its doors to us in this way and will be a special opportunity because the Library is providing: one of its best rooms; its expert curators (along with their expertise and their white gloves); a newly launched website (containing new resources); and of course, items from its collection (including rare and usually unavailable material) which we can look at, learn from, and use, to improve WP articles. For example, on the chosen topic (Australia and WWI), the Library holds many diaries and manuscripts from the period.

As you can see from the Library's project page, they have connected this editathon with their own work. They have already set out a wide range of resources to make things easier for us. Please sign up on the editathon project page if you can participate either online or in person with other Wikipedians. Hope to see you there! Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:24, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

This message has been delivered using AutoWikiBrowser to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Sydney.

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryan Miller (author) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Miller (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ryan Miller (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 12:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)