User talk:JohnRussell/Archive 3

GA Review - On Hold
Hi. I reviewed your nomination for Readers' Advisory and I put in On Hold for now. It still needs a lot of work to be a GA; I left some recommendations on the talk page. Intothewoods29 (talk) 18:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Reader's advisory
Category:Reader's advisory, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 00:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Alphabetization and collation
I am inviting you to comment, in your capacity as a librarian, at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. -- Wavelength (talk) 18:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Art controversy
Please see our guidelines for including external links: WP:EL. Blogs are rarely appropriate for inclusion. -- The Red Pen of Doom  12:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wikipedia Art controversy
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wikipedia Art controversy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable - no significant 3rd party coverage shown.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- The Red Pen of Doom  19:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Music for Films.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Music for Films.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

User:JohnRussell/wikipedianumedits
Hi, is Template User:JohnRussell/wikipedianumedits intended for total edits, or just those in article space? --Redrose64 (talk) 16:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:10eastern drawing of the album cover for Brian Eno's album Ambient 1 Music for Airports.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:10eastern drawing of the album cover for Brian Eno's album Ambient 1 Music for Airports.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 13:40, 16 May 2010 (UTC)