User talk:JohnWoods1025/Tagdal

Final Review
Hi John, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: The article could benefit from some proofreading. The language is unencyclopedic (many agentless passives). 3 points.
 * 2) Structure: The article follows its own idiosyncratic template and it is not clear what, if any, guiding principles govern it. 2 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: It is difficult to gauge the accuracy of the article as most claims are unsourced and nearly all of the sources are low-quality. 1 point.
 * 5) Relevance: Not all of the information is relevant to the subject. 4 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 666/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 2 points.

The final score is 17/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)