User talk:John Dowsett

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=574144220 your edit] to Betamax may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * manufacturers honoured to replace broken, and stolen machines that spare part alone could not fix .Betamax had a duel reason for decommissioning there video reorder as Betamax also became Video-

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=576723673 your edit] to Betamax may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 0/Beta4)can record approx 4rs 20mins on PAL and Secam modles, and 6hrs 15mins on NTSC modles  Phase Alernatng Line, and National Television System Commitee and  "Sequential Colour with Memory" (

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Betamax, you may be blocked from editing. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  14:47, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Betacam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  14:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for the same behavior that got you blocked last time. Basically, you waited out your block, then came back and tried to reinsert the same original research. This is your last chance--if you do the same thing again after this block expires, the next block will be indefinite. In the meantime, I suggest reading WP:V and WP:OR, to of the cornerstone policies of Wikipedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:07, 11 October 2013 (UTC)


 * This is your only chance: if you post another unblock request that doesn't give a clear, specific, policy based reason to unblock you, I will remove your ability to edit this talk page. If you post that Betamax original research here again, I'm just going to go ahead and block you indefinitely without access to this talk page. This is a waste of everyone else's time. The fact that you don't understand or refuse to follow our rules is no longer our problem. Read WP:OR, read WP:V, ask if you don't understand, but stop trying to violate what is basically Wikipedia's most fundamental policy. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)