User talk:John M Wolfson/Archive 7

WP:ELECTCOM2021
Hello John M Wolfson. Thank you for volunteering for the Electoral Commission for the 2021 ArbCom Election. Following the closure of the ELECTCOM RfC, you have been selected as a reserve commissioner. Congratulations! Some important pages to watch about the election are: Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Coordination, Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Coordination, Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021, and others in Category:Wikipedia Arbitration Committee Elections 2021. As a reservist you have no official duties, but your assistance and expertise are welcome as a de facto coordinator. In the event of a vacancy in the commission, you may be activated - should this be required it is generally declared by the majority of the remaining active commissioners. Again, thank you for volunteering for this important position. Best regards, — xaosflux  Talk 23:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I look forward to helping the process and learning the ropes! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 23:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

RfA Proposals
John, I'm not sure why you removed the "don't post here yet" besides some nominal sense the template had been up too long. The idea is to do a whole bunch of work to launch it so everyone is noticed at once. I want to give people a bit more time to weigh in on things before starting a clock that will be hard to reverse. Beyond that, I would suggest your proposal might need a subpage as what was there was not a 1-3 sentence neutral statement. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:25, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The template explicitly says to remove it once it's been several hours since the last edit; I also interpreted this diff to mean that its launch would be imminent. On a lesser note, I don't want to create too many subpages, and I tried my best to be neutral on the proposal. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 20:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Templates are laborious for me so I didn't want to create a custom one that had perfect wording so I went with the least worst one. I had hoped that by doing that, rather than the more common Under construction everyone would understand the intent and wait. In the end no huge deal. I understand the reluctance to create too many subpages. It is indeed a balance between creating subpages and trying to keep a page that will be easily navigable especially if we get a large number of proposals. That difficult with too much is something that's already come up on the Brainstorming page and is certainly a concern I want to be sensitive to owing to the desire to reach as large of a segement of the community as possible. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Just wanted to let you know that the proposals period has now started. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

RfA Reform 2021 Phase 2 has begun
Following a 2 week brainstorming period and a 1 week proposal period, the 30 day discussion of changes to our Request for Adminship process has begun. Following feedback on Phase 1, in order to ensure that the largest number of people possible can see all proposals, new proposals will only be accepted for the for the first 7 days of Phase 2. The 30 day discussion is scheduled to last until November 30. Please join the discussion or even submit your own proposal.

There is 1 future mailing planned with the results of Phase 2. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. 16:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Adminabili
You seem to have responded to a comment of mine other than the one that used the word "adminabiles" with small details about the plural. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 00:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I was referring to your edit summary. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Notification of template substitution

 * Hello John M Wolfson. I just wanted to thank you for opting-in to receive these notifications. This is the first bot-notification of the trial now in progress. In this case, the notification is a bit late as the goal is to have them posted within 24 hours of the original message. I anticipate that things will improve over time. I'd like to reiterate that you are under no obligation to endorse this or any posted message although you are certainly welcome if you are so inclined. In considering an endorsement, you have fulfilled what was asked of you opting-in. I won't be messaging you in the future when this notification posts, and don't mean to encroach on you now. I am messaging you this time for two reasons; first: because this is the beginning of the trial and I did want to send you my thanks. And, second: because I wanted to tell you about another editor I messaged (without using the template) but you may know this former admin whose tools were removed for inactivity (not under a cloud) and again, you are certainly welcome to consider endorsing that message as well. It is on the talk page of user:Toddst1. I wish you the best and thank you again.--John Cline (talk) 06:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is, who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:


 * 1) with 5072 points
 * 2) with 3276 points
 * 3) with 3197 points
 * 4) with 1611 points
 * 5) with 1571 points
 * 6) with 1420 points
 * 7) with 1043 points
 * 8) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.


 * wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
 * wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
 * wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
 * wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
 * wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
 * wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Quick question about a mislinked diff
Hi John, hope you're well. I was looking at WT:VITAL and saw the link to a discussion about a biography moratorium, but the diff linked (Special:Diff/10519587) goes to the wrong place -- a vandalism revert in mainspace. Any chance that could be fixed? I'm sticking my head back in a little bit, and I'm wanting to catch up on some stuff in that sphere. Sorry to come to your doorstep with a complaint, and have a good day! Vaticidalprophet 03:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Fixed. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 12:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Flopped image
"Vertically-flipped image" might have a different interpretation than "image reflected along a vertical axis", unfortunately... AnonMoos (talk) 16:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you have a better short description, you can add it; however, some short description is better than none. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * It's "Horizontally flipped image" which would actually mean the same thing as "image mirror-reflected along a vertical axis", so you gave it a different meaning when you shortened it. AnonMoos (talk) 16:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * That's fair. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:53, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Party results shading
Template:Party results shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Holiday greetings (2021)
John, I sincerely hope your holiday season goes well this year especially with what we went through last year. I'm optimistic that 2022 will be a better year for all of us: both in real life and on Wikipedia. Wishing you the best from, Interstellarity (talk) 13:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

09970549022
09970549022 2400:AC40:60B:FD61:799E:6EF3:AEFE:F3DE (talk) 23:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

RFA 2021 Completed
The 2021 re-examination of RFA has been completed. 23 (plus 2 variants) ideas were proposed. Over 200 editors participated in this final phase. Three changes gained consensus and two proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration. Thanks to all who helped to close the discussion, and in particular, , and for closing the most difficult conversations and for  for closing the review of one of the closes.

The following proposals gained consensus and have all been implemented:
 * 1) Revision of standard question 1 to Special thanks to  for help with implementation.
 * 2) A new process, Administrative Action Review (XRV) designed to review if an editor's specific use of an advanced permission, including the admin tools, is consistent with policy in a process similar to that of deletion review and move review. Thanks to all the editors who contributed (and are continuing to contribute) to the discussion of how to implement this proposal.
 * 3) Removal of autopatrol from the administrator's toolkit. Special thanks to and  for their help with implementation.

The following proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration:
 * 1) An option for people to run for temporary adminship ( proposal, discussion, & close )
 * 2) An optional election process ( proposal & discussion and close review & re-close )

Editors who wish to discuss these ideas or other ideas on how to try to address any of the six issues identified during phase 1 for which no proposal gained are encouraged to do so at RFA's talk page or an appropriate village pump.

A final and huge thanks all those who participated in this effort to improve our RFA process over the last 4 months. This is the final update with no further talk page messages planned. 01:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

TY and FYI
Thank you for your earnest attention to sourcing the First Wikipedia edit page. I want, FYI, to call your attention to my beginning a top to bottom check of citations and their formatting (since I have no subject matter expertise to bring to bear, there). That is, adding access-dates, authors, wikilinks, etc.

In doing the first eight citations, I had to make one correction (demoted citation, since no mention there of the January 15th date). But more critically I hit a wall in trying to interpret and check the author TwoOneTwo (HomePage) citation, because the page that appears via the link does not seem to be the one desired. (User:TwoOneTwo does not appear on that webpage, nor does the date given for the citation appear there—so something is amiss.) I wrote an in-text ( — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 11:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest. Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
 * The template db-afc-move has been created - this template is similar to db-move when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Regional capitals
Are there plans for WikiProject Cities/Regional capitals? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I just thought it would be a better idea to have taskforces than the old "Top/High/Mid/Low importance" rankings; while regional capitals might not be the most important thing in the Old World, state/provincial capitals are quite a big deal in the Western Hemisphere. You are more than welcome to do work for the taskforce if you feel so inclined. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 22:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Lake Street Transfer
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Skip-stop on the Chicago "L"
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

March songs
Thank you for support in the RfC for DYK - music with a chance to listen, - the piece by Anna Korsun begins after about one hour, and the voices afterwards call "Freiheit!" instead of "Freude". Music every day, pictured in songs. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

The Prayer is on the Main page, finally + new flowers --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Metropolitan main line
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lake Street Transfer
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lake Street Transfer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lake Street Transfer
The article Lake Street Transfer you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lake Street Transfer for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lake Street Transfer
The article Lake Street Transfer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lake Street Transfer for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 02:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:


 * 1) Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
 * 2) 🇨🇽 AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
 * 3) Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
 * 4) Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
 * 5) Vexilloid of the Roman Empire.svg Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
 * 6) Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
 * 7) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
live happy life with it

WKamYA (talk) 12:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC) 

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee,  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  11:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Mick Jagger nominated for FAC
Hello John M Wolfson, Mick Jagger has been nominated for Featured Article status. If you'd like to take part in the discussion, it can be found here. I am reaching out as you commented on Featured article candidates/Paint It Black/archive1. I hope that you have a great weekend! -- The SandDoctor Talk 19:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Forgot to mention this earlier, but there is currently a peer review underway for The Rolling Stones. If you would like to participate, you are more than welcome. If not, that's totally fine. I am very appreciative of the help with Paint It Black and hope that we can work together again sometime.  The SandDoctor  Talk 05:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 July newsletter
The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * ICS Zulu.svg BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
 * Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Stub template
Does this template serve a purpose (NYC election stub) or was it created in error? I wanted to check in with you first before TfDing it just in case. Curbon7 (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

It was created as an act of laziness, since I was creating many NYC election stubs at one point and wanted to make their talkpage starts more efficient. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2019
Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * This is way late (I don't even do NPPs anymore), but I do admire your dedication and persistence to awarding it. Thanks! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Happy Second Adminship Anniversary!
 Happy Adminship Anniversary! Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Madison station (CTA)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Laflin station
 Schwede 66  12:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

How did I do?
It's been a year since my probation began, and you said that would last for a year. How did I do on Wikipedia during that time? JTZegers (talk) 19:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Canal station (CTA Metropolitan Main Line)
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter
The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
 * Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
 * ICS Zulu.svg BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
 * Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
 * PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
 * Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
 * Pirate Flag of Jack Rackham.svg Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
 * Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
 * Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
 * Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Ford Thunderbird (eleventh generation)
Recent edits were made for clarity and concision, to remove excessive wordiness and poor grammar. Your stated reason for reverting the recent edits was "Idk what was going on with this." That's not a bona fide reason for reverting edits. Please elaborate. 842U (talk) 12:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Your edits made things largely worse, rather than better, and removed a substantial amount of content (especially with regards to powertrain and reception), hence my concerns and ultimate reversion. In any event, always use edit summaries so we know what you mean when you edit things. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 12:35, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Replaced the edits, giving substantial followup in the edit notes.  The intro was highly problematic: it used hyperbole, peacockery, and opinions ("beauty and elegence" are highly subjective) to fluff up the intro with poorly cited material in the article (the plastic issue was one reviewer's opinion), etc.  My point was to make the intro concise with less flowery language -- leaving out info that really doesn't belong in a summary.  Hope this helps.842U (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Saw your edits. The legacy thing is difficult to pin down legitimately. My sense is that for a car as young as the 11th Gen, very often what's called legacy is opinion masquerading as consensus. The car was only introduced 20 years ago -- its not like a Model T which has a genuine legacy that's been vetted, the subject of scholarly study, etc.  The production years vs. the model years, there should be no confusion about model years when its linked.  To include both sets of years seems trifling: this is a lede, not a dissection of minutiae.  That's my take, but I appreciate working with you rather than working against each other. Cheers.842U (talk) 21:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Marshfield station
Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Franklin Street Terminal DYK nomination
Hi, John, I reviewed your DYK nomination of Franklin Street Terminal and found some issues. I think it's a good hook and interesting facts. I hope the issues can be addressed. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 21:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thought I'd take this tangential comment/question to your talk page. I discovered I can get a used copy of Moffat's book (1995 version) for a really good deal. (It's not at my local library.) Do you you think you'll be doing other articles about the "L" where you use this source? If so, I'll get it so I could review or help review and have the source in front of me. If not, I'll not get it. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 18:29, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I have currently used it in several articles (including one, Lake Street Transfer station, currently at FAC if you'd like to hop on *cough cough*) and will likely use it in more. Do note that I'm currently lending it from my library and have to return it this weekend, but have a copy in the clutter of my home and can use it subsequently for future articles. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 18:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for the ping. (Not everyone sees my request for that.) If you are not completely fed up with me as a reviewer at this point and think it would be of value, I can get this one for $10 (including shipping) online. It will probably take 5 or so days to get here so I wouldn't let not having it hold up this review. Let me know. I am a book collector (also with much clutter, including many books in boxes that need to be shelved... on non-existent shelves). – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 18:47, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you're familiar with the FAC page structure, the Lake Street Transfer station is already in the middle of the "Older nominations" section, so it'll probably stay up for only about another week or so. That said, I plan on submitting the entirety of the Logan Square branch and Met main line to FAC in due course, including such stations as Grand (currently undergoing a GAN from my friend Epicgenius) and Madison (not really ready for even GAN, but interesting and something to put in your watchlist if you're so inclined), so I think it's a worthwhile investment. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 18:56, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Ordered (including, of course, 6 other unplanned books... there is a sale).
 * I will put Madison station on my watch list. I am familiar with FAC and GAN, having reviewed and been reviewed for both (as well as a FL); I have a short but pretty list of Wikichievements. Currently working on several others right now. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 20:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Cool, thanks! Best of luck on your future WikiEndeavors! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 20:56, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Usernames
Regarding [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Extraordinary_Writ&diff=1126389522&oldid=1126388724 this comment]: once upon a time, it was common for someone to ask those requesting administrative privileges if the usernames in a given list were compliant with policy. (There was also a period of time when someone would ask if the candidate would voluntarily follow a recall process.) isaacl (talk) 03:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Well I've known about the recall stuff (and am no stranger to asking "standardized" RfA questions myself), but that list is even sillier than I thought. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:58, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Martin F. Tanahey
Thanks for the heads up. If you want me to conduct a GAN for this article, I'd be happy to do so. However, I will note that it may take me a long time to actually get through the review (as you can probably see from how long it's taking me to get through Talk:Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch)/GA1, which apparently I've forgotten to comment on for two weeks). – Epicgenius (talk) 18:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey while you're certainly my first choice for GAN, I can see your plate is rather full, so I have pinged others as well; in any event, don't worry about it, and focus (at your convenience) on the Grand article. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 19:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I'd be willing to look at it but I'm out of town this coming week and it's impossible to get much work done while traveling. If you need me, ping me again after December 18 and I'll see what I can do. Wehwalt (talk) 02:49, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Duly noted, and no rush! FYI, it's a challenge to myself to write an (eventual) FA under 10k bytes, which should help explain some of my edits/the style. Thanks! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Martin F. Tanahey
I cannot for a few weeks commit the time to review an article for a good article review. If nobody has tackled it by the point I have free time, I’ll give a look at being a good article reviewer for the first time with that article. SecretName101 (talk) 03:57, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries, I think someone else will take care of it by then. Thanks! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Franklin Street Terminal
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Martin F. Tanahey
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Martin F. Tanahey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SecretName101 -- SecretName101 (talk) 09:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I have put the review on hold. Suggestions have been provided of what needs to be done to meet the needed criteria to pass. Feel free to ask for further input from me. SecretName101 (talk) 10:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, John M Wolfson!


Happy New Year! John M Wolfson, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you, . You as well! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 22:20, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

No Time to Die
Hi! First of all, I would like to wish you a happy new year 🎇🎊 I saw that the article No Time to Die recently was vandalized by several IPs, adding out-of-the-box, non-encyclopedic information. Please consider locking this post for a while to prevent this. Thank you Hongkytran (talk) 04:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey thanks for your concerns, but this should go to Requests for Page Protection. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 04:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * But I really don't know how to work on this page, and I'm afraid that my request won't be noticed and implemented. Please you reconsider! Hongkytran (talk) 13:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Holden Block
The article Holden Block you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Holden Block and Talk:Holden Block/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Roosevelt station (CTA Douglas branch)
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Holden Block
The article Holden Block you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Holden Block for comments about the article, and Talk:Holden Block/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

CTA stuff
Hi John, I made the necessary template corrections here, invocations for some stations were missing. Also when you get the chance, can you help me with Loomis station? It got reverted to a redirect but I initially created it to get rid of a redlink on Lake Street Transfer station, Thanks  Cards   84664   18:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Very many thanks for the station fixes! Those were quite annoying errors I was getting. I have reverted the Loomis redirection, but a) I wonder if "CTA Lake branch" is still better than "CTA Lake Street Elevated"? I don't have enough primary sources at hand to make that decision as to when the switch was made, or if that was what it was called pre-1969, and b) for future reference, it's perfectly acceptable to have redlinks on Featured Articles if there's a reasonable expectation that the article will eventually be created, so there's no rush in such creation; that said, might as well make the article now I guess. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 18:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Honestly I was using (Lake Street Elevated) for the elevated itself and (Lake branch) for the at-grade stations.  Cards   84664   18:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't think that distinction works. I think it's better to use "Lake branch" to refer to the Lake-Dan Ryan Line era of routing, and 1948 sources refer to the line as a whole as the "Lake Street 'L'" and it wouldn't be a proper "branch" like Humboldt Park or Logan Square; then again, the "Westchester branch" is merely the continuation of the Garfield Park line, but a branch from the CA&E, so hmmm. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 18:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Damen station (CTA Blue Line)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Damen station (CTA Blue Line) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Damen station (CTA Blue Line)
The article Damen station (CTA Blue Line) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Damen station (CTA Blue Line) and Talk:Damen station (CTA Blue Line)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 16:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Metropolitan main line
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Metropolitan main line you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 22:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Damen station (CTA Blue Line)
The article Damen station (CTA Blue Line) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Damen station (CTA Blue Line) for comments about the article, and Talk:Damen station (CTA Blue Line)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Metropolitan main line
The article Metropolitan main line you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Metropolitan main line for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch)
The article Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch) and Talk:Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 23:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch)
The article Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch) for comments about the article, and Talk:Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch)
The article Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch) and Talk:Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 05:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch)
The article Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch) for comments about the article, and Talk:Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 22:02, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 14th Place station
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 1830 Liverpool by-election
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Grand station (CTA Logan Square branch)
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bellwood station (Chicago Aurora and Elgin Railroad)
Hello! Your submission of Bellwood station (Chicago Aurora and Elgin Railroad) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pbritti (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Damen station (CTA Blue Line)
-- RoySmith (talk) 07:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Bellwood station (Chicago Aurora and Elgin Railroad)
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for Lake Street Transfer station, introduced as "a double-decker transit station on the Chicago "L" from 1913 to 1951. Both lines had been constructed in the 1890s, but didn't merge operations until 1913 or constructed the transfer until then. The upper station's line was replaced by a subway in 1951, which took it closer to downtown."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Division station (CTA Logan Square branch)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Division station (CTA Logan Square branch) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 09:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Chicago station (CTA Logan Square branch)
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Division station (CTA Logan Square branch)
The article Division station (CTA Logan Square branch) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Division station (CTA Logan Square branch) and Talk:Division station (CTA Logan Square branch)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 16:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Division station (CTA Logan Square branch)
The article Division station (CTA Logan Square branch) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Division station (CTA Logan Square branch) for comments about the article, and Talk:Division station (CTA Logan Square branch)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 00:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Fixed image sizes
I was wondering why we cannot do fixed image sizes. It is impossible to read the images since they are so small? CheersPatapsco913 (talk) 17:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * per MOS:UPRIGHT, one should use  instead of fixed image sizes due to mobile users, etc. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 18:01, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * cool. Learn something every day. Thanks! Patapsco913 (talk) 18:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 March newsletter
So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
 * Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
 * 🇩🇪 FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
 * 🇺🇸 TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
 * Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.

The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included LunaEatsTuna,  Thebiguglyalien,  Sammi Brie,  Trainsandotherthings,  🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, 🇮🇩 Juxlos,  Unexpectedlydian,  SounderBruce, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Kosack,  BennyOnTheLoose and  PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)