User talk:John May's Assassin

Speedy deletion nomination of Adolf Hitler/Pagenotice


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. 28bytes (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Subst:PAGENAME


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bhockey10 (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Bhockey10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bhockey10 (talk) 15:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Walmartfan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bhockey10 (talk) 15:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:User V
Category:User V, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 11:02, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
I want to ensure that you realize that the purpose of Wikipedia is to create an encylcopedia. While humour is allowed, it should not be your primary focus. Your edits are disruptive in that you are creating templates, categories, and pages that will require deletion, and you are tagging accounts as sockpuppets without any regard to our guidelines for doing so. Wikipedia is not your personal playground, and if you continue to treat it as such you will likely find yourself blocked. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:03, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

This is a warning that you violated Wikipedia policy. Stop with the vandalism as you did on my talk page or you will be blocked. Kierzek (talk) 21:14, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Sock tags
Please do not add templates to user's pages as you did here. It isn't possible for a registered account to be an IP sockpuppet anyway. Additionally, your addition of to 's talk page is effectively a personal attack since it is blatantly untrue. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:00, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/SirEpicBob for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts, and various kinds of disruptive editing, including personal attacks, creating unsuitable pages, etc etc.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.