User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)/Archive 1

Welcome
 Hello, John P. Sadowski (NIOSH), and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

John P. Sadowski (NIOSH), good luck, and have fun.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
Amortias (T)(C) 23:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Intratracheal instillation
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Pharyngeal aspiration
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

j'accuse
I have a problem with the nycosh.org/wp-content source used in Hazard elimination. That NYCOSH is putting what looks like non-official drivel into a folder specific for Wikipedia use creates the appearance of an employee self-publishing sources and using them here. I think this practice ought to stop. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 05:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Your concerns seem to be based on a few errors. First of all, I work for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, a U.S. federal government agency.  The source is from the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health, an independent nonprofit organization.  Second, "wp-content" is the standard name for a directory for media uploaded for WordPress; it has nothing to do with Wikipedia.  There is no self-publishing going on here.
 * Do you consider the source to be unreliable? Looking through NYCOSH's publications, they seem reasonable, and a Google search doesn't reveal anything to call their legitimacy into question.  If you have information that the source or publisher are unreliable, I would very much like to know about it so I can deal with it appropriately.  John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 06:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't have a problem with NYCOSH as an entity. My concern is that the document cited doesn't look like an official publication but just what some employee typed up. I don't see the editorial control (whether for WordPress or Wikipedia) that I'd expect of a "reliable source" and as I've said, I think this practice ought to stop. I wouldn't take what the Governor of New York tweets as being reliable or official work product and I wouldn't accept this source, either. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The layout leaves much to be desired, but the content is consistent with other sources. I have no reason to believe that the source is unreliable. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, I found the original archived version here. It looks like someone just did a poor job of exporting it to a PDF when they changed the website.  John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. Had I seen the original version I probably would not have raised the issue. I was wrong to make the accusation. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Hazard elimination
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Sticky mat
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Occupational diving health and safety sources.
Hi John, My field of interest includes occupational diving health and safety. If you have good sources for anything in this field you can leave a link on my talk page or on the WikiProject Scuba diving discussion page. Or just edit the appropriate article/s. Cheers, &bull; &bull; &bull; Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:37, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the request. I've posted what I've found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scuba diving.  John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 22:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Louis René-Villermé
Although Mary Mark Ockerbloom didn't ping you, she has replied to your question on the nomination page, so you should be able to continue your review. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Substitution of dangerous chemicals
Isn't this just talking about the same thing as Hazard substitution just using non standard terminology? I'm very tempted to turn the page into a redirect to Hazard substitution. What do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geni (talk • contribs) 17:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Well, hazard substitution applies not only to chemicals but also to equipment and processes, so substitution of chemicals is properly a subtopic of substitution. That being said, the Substitution of dangerous chemicals article covers chemicals in more detail but does have some issues (written by researcher citing their own research, refs are not inline, not always encyclopedic tone), so I would prefer to keep it in hopes that it is improved rather than trashing it or merging it to Hazard substitution. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 18:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Thank you for looking.©Geni (talk) 18:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Hazard substitution
Mifter (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Toilet plume
Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Tapered element oscillating microbalance
Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Health and safety hazards of nanomaterials
Alex ShihTalk 12:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Radioactive nanoparticle
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Occupational epidemiology
Alex ShihTalk 00:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Titanium dioxide nanoparticle
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Graphene
Could I ask you some more informations about graphene? I don’t understand some cardinals point Eugeniocazzo (talk) 23:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Sure, I'll try to help answer any questions!

Thank you. Well firstly I don’t understand how the structure of a material can change its properties: if i take one atom layer of gold it has the same properties as if I had taken a block of it, right ? But then graphene doesn’t follow this logic because from my understanding if you take only one atom layer of graphite you get a layer of graphene ( please correct me if I’m being completely wrong ). Second question - while reading about graphene properties I found out that 10 one atom layer of graphene could stop most common bullet fired from even quite powerful shotguns, if so how is this possible? We wouldn’t even be able do see such thin “walls” and yet they would be able to stop such a strong impact, it doesn’t make sense for what concerns current physic. Excuse me for the badly written english but I’m not a native speaker. Hoping to understand a little more about graphene. Eugeniocazzo (talk) 15:44, 23 November 2017 (UTC)