User talk:John Scagleone

June 2023
Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Andre🚐 12:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Without you providing reliable sources to back up your claims, we cannot accept your opinion as a reliable source. We have multiple articles that cover the subject of Russian interference in the U.S. elections from many angles, and they are backed by thousands of RS. Here are some of them:


 * 2016 United States election leaks
 * Links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies
 * Donald Trump's disclosures of classified information
 * Hillary Clinton email controversy
 * Cyberwarfare by Russia
 * 2017–2018 Department of Justice metadata seizures
 * Democratic National Committee cyber attacks
 * Democratic National Committee v. Russian Federation
 * Dismissal of James Comey
 * Foreign electoral intervention
 * Foreign policy of Donald Trump (2015–16)
 * Podesta emails
 * Russia–United States relations
 * Russian espionage in the United States
 * Russian interference (2016)
 * Russian interference (2018)
 * Russian interference (2020)
 * Timelines related to Donald Trump and Russian interference in United States elections
 * Trump Tower meeting


 * Have fun. -- Valjean (talk) ( PING me ) 15:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Civil Rights Act of 1964, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.  City o f  Silver  23:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


 * It said Democrats and Republicans pushed to stop it when it was only Democrats that were fighting against it. Republicans had been trying to push through the legislation for decades. How is saying the southern Democrats created Jim Crow not relevant to the topic?
 * The republicans were created to end slavery. John Scagleone (talk) 23:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * A god hunk of that page is revisionist history. It was 100% the democrats that started segregation, and were the cause of the Civil Rights Act even needed to be establishes. It is pushing a political narrative and a lot of that page needs to be edited.
 * In the copy and paste below the word "Republicans" needs to be removed because it is historically not true. All the names under it are even Democrat come on man
 * "Democrats and Republicans from the Southern states opposed the bill and led an unsuccessful 60 working day filibuster, including Senators Albert Gore, Sr. (D-TN) and J. William Fulbright (D-AR), as well as Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), who personally filibustered for 14 hours straight." John Scagleone (talk) 23:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * "Democrats and Republicans from the Southern states opposed the bill and led an unsuccessful 60 working day filibuster, including Senators Albert Gore, Sr. (D-TN) and J. William Fulbright (D-AR), as well as Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), who personally filibustered for 14 hours straight." John Scagleone (talk) 23:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Of the 71 senators who voted to end cloture (and thus make the Civil Rights Act the law of the land), 44 were Democrats and of the 29 who opposed, six were Republicans.


 * You added the information about Jim Crow as a partisan attack on modern Democrats, which I know because that parenthetical you added after Robert Byrd's name was the same sort of crap.  City o f  Silver  23:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * that was speaking about fillibusters. No Republicans filibustered. Robert Byrd is the mentor of president Joe Biden. That's not even a hidden fact, history doesn't care about emotions. That whole page ignores the reality of why that legislation was even needed. John Scagleone (talk) 23:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Something can be both true and irrelevant. This whole debate belongs on your Facebook page or something like that because you're out of chances here.  City o f  Silver  23:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * While what you say is most definitely true, in this case its necessary. But I should've expected this. Everyone told me wikipedia isn't as trusted as it used to be and pushes propaganda now. Do what you want to do but one day the African Americans will wake up to this scam that's been used on them. I'm disappointed in this site John Scagleone (talk) 23:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Spouting racist garbage like this is not permitted here. Download the Facebook app.  City o f  Silver  23:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Civil Rights Act of 1964.  City o f  Silver  23:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

You can take all that up on Facebook: your commentary is inappropriate on Wikipedia. To state the obvious: I'm talking about stuff like this. Drmies (talk) 23:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 23:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)