User talk:John blacker

Speedy deletion of Controlled Demolition Slang
A tag has been placed on Controlled Demolition Slang, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 00:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Vianello (talk) 00:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Pull is not a place to advance an argument about the Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center: the word isn't big enough to carry all the weight you're trying to place on it, and we do already have an article on this subject.  Acroterion  (talk)  11:36, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee enforcement
In accordance with the decision of ArbComm found at WP:Requests for arbitration/September 11 conspiracy theories, you are on notice that further attempts to edit contentiously on 9/11-related topics may result in restrictions on your editing.  Acroterion  (talk)  17:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)