User talk:John kirk

Image Tagging for Image:Wikijib3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wikijib3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. Fraslet 17:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Jedforest
Hi John. Thanks for your unsigned message. Please remember to sign your posts using  (four tildes) on all talk pages if you want a response in future.

To answer your question about your band: the article was deleted by an administrator (not me, although I nominated it for deletion) for two reasons.


 * 1) It was a direct copyright violation from another website. Wikipedia accepts only original, verifiable work. We do not accept text copied directly from another website or source, especially when that source clearly states "© 2005 Jedforest Instrumental Band. All rights reserved." When you entered the text into Wikipedia, you were given a clear message that said "Do not violate any copyright! You agree to license all submissions under the GFDL. Use verifiable sources for encyclopedia content." You did not follow that instruction.
 * 2) Articles on Wikipedia must be of encyclopedic merit. This means they must be about a notable subject and must assert notability for their subject. The copyright violation article in question did not assert notability for the group, so the deleting administrator also quoted one of our speedy deletion criteria, CSD-A7 (failure to assert notability). Additionally, although this was not quoted by the administrator in question, the article failed to meet with one of our standards for inclusion in the encyclopedia - quoted at this page.

In these circumstances, the administrator was entirely correct to delete the article in both respects - either problem was enough - and therefore there seems little that can be done.

Your contributions to Wikipedia are most welcome, so don't let this put you off! Whilst you should not recreate the article, there are plenty of other articles you could work on - we value the knowledge everyone brings to Wikipedia on all subjects.

Below is our standard "welcome" message for new users. It has some helpful links to useful pages that are essential reading for everyone - myself included! ➨  ЯEDVERS  10:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

 Welcome, !

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Redvers, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png|23px]]  The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * [[Image:Crystal package utilities.png|23px]]  How to edit a page
 * [[Image:Crystal khelpcenter.png|23px]]  Help pages
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|23px]]  Tutorial
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png|23px|]]  How to write a great article
 * [[Image:Crystal_Clear_app_kedit.png|23px]]  Manual of Style
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps konquest.png|23px]]  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ➨  ЯEDVERS  10:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

''# It was a direct copyright violation from another website. Wikipedia accepts only original, verifiable work. We do not accept text copied directly from another website or source, especially when that source clearly states "© 2005 Jedforest Instrumental Band. All rights reserved." When you entered the text into Wikipedia, you were given a clear message that said "Do not violate any copyright! You agree to license all submissions under the GFDL. Use verifiable sources for encyclopedia content." You did not follow that instruction. ''# Articles on Wikipedia must be of encyclopedic merit. This means they must be about a notable subject and must assert notability for their subject. The copyright violation article in question did not assert notability for the group, so the deleting administrator also quoted one of our speedy deletion criteria, CSD-A7 (failure to assert notability). Additionally, although this was not quoted by the administrator in question, the article failed to meet with one of our standards for inclusion in the encyclopedia - quoted at this page.''

1. I own all the copyright for the website in question. I allow wiki to use any content found on www.jedforestinstrumentalband.org.uk (how do I make this legal?)

2. Notable merit of the JIB is vast. both in historic tearms and recent national achievement. Even to its continuous charitable status since its formation for the very first Border Games in 1854. (one year before the formation of the Dlack Dyke Mills band)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Dyke_Mills_Band

john kirk

Copyright
Hi John. Just to point out, you're making it very difficult to leave messages for you. Please remember to sign your posts using  (four tildes) on all talk pages. This produces a full signature with your name and a link to your page. Do this even if you're not logged in - your previous message was both unsigned and unlogged-in, so I had no idea who it was from or how to get in touch with you. It's also a good idea to log-on anyways - there's an option when you do to stay logged in, so it's worth ticking that.

Now, your questions.


 * 1) There are two ways of dealing with this. The easiest from Wikipedia's point of view is for you to drop your copyright claim entirely. On your website, replace the copyright line with "Material is licenced under the GDFL". That means people can use it for anything they like, as long as they link back to you in some way. You lose control of the text but anyone can freely use it wherever they like.
 * Alternatively, you need to contact our copyright department at permissions AT wikimedia DOT org and give your consent to the use of the material by Wikipedia. This also, in effect, means you are licencing the text under the GDFL. That means people can use it for anything they like, as long as they link back to Wikipedia in some way. You lose control of the text but anyone can freely use it wherever they like.
 * Note that this means people can set up parody sites, set up duplicate sites, do whatever they like - and you cannot stop them. You have given away your rights to the text.


 * Now, as for notability. I dare say your organisation does have notability. But you managed to write an entire article that didn't assert that notability even once. It was a nice sales pitch, a useful bit of local information about a local band - but it wasn't an encyclopedia article.
 * So you would need to correct this straight off. The welcome message above has some really useful advice that you really should read. But getting the article included in Wikipedia boils down to making sure you explain fully, clearly and concisely - in the first sentence - why the band is notable. There must be something, some fact or figure that really stands out.
 * Also, make sure the article has lots of relevant links out to other Wikipedia articles so it doesn't look lonely or ophaned. Make sure the article only links to your own website once, clearly at the bottom. But also make sure you provide some nice sources for every assertion you make. So, if you say "the band won the Dixons Motors Award in 1997", link to a newspaper article where that is mentioned, or the awards website where it is mentioned, or a third-party site with that information.

Doing these things is the bare minimum you'll need to do, but it'll help.

One thing you can do, of course, is to start the article in your userspace: User:John kirk/Jedforest Instrumental Band. Slowly and carefully build the article up, bearing in mind the points above. It will be protected from deletion where it stands. Then, when you're sure it's as good as it could be, contact me, or another Wikiperson, or even just type:  on to this page. If you do the latter, someone with experience will show up here and you can ask them to help with having the article checked against WP:MUSIC and WP:NOTABILITY. They'll know what that means, and they'll happily check it (or get someone else to check it). Then, when all is well, they will move the article into the mainspace (ie the encyclopedia) and Bob's your glamorous uncle!

I hope this helps! If you need any more advice, please contact me - but remember to sign your posts using  (four tildes) on all talk pages! It really helps! ➨  ЯEDVERS  15:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Quaver.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Quaver.gif, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Floyd 2
A tag has been placed on Floyd 2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Seraphim Whipp 09:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)


 * It's up to you to provide independent verifiable sources that your article meets the notability guidelines. Jimfbleak 10:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wikijib.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wikijib.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 07:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wikijib2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wikijib2.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 07:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wikijib4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wikijib4.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 07:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Powerhouse rock band


A tag has been placed on Powerhouse rock band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 17:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Gadji logo.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gadji logo.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

The article Power-Soul has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did here to Soul music. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view and verifiability policies, and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please cite a reliable source to both verify the information you write and prove it is relevant to the article you write it in. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:33, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes... sorry about the messy entries. Just getting my hear around linking correctly within Wiki. I know what I am trying to get across is worthy, its a case of knowing how to present it correctly.. I got off to a bad start. just worked out how to sign these messages recently for instance :) John kirk (talk) 00:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Gadji (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Kirk


 * Powerhouse (rock band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Hollow Ground

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Launchballer/archive/2013
"Than you for the concise editing of the powerhouse entry.." was posted by you on 22:39, 12 August 2013‎ at User talk:Launchballer/archive/2013, and I have only just received it. Messages should always go on my talk page (click "chba" in my signature to access it) however this one I recommend leaving here. It was a pleasure rewriting what was a very poorly assembled article into something that might pass an AfD.-- Laun  chba  ller  01:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Powerhouse (rock band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Powerhouse (rock band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Powerhouse (rock band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 03:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hollow Ground (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Powerhouse (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Greenage Album.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Greenage Album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gadji member's first single.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Gadji member's first single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Example of Artwork by Alexander Millar.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Example of Artwork by Alexander Millar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Springwood Park International festival ground.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Springwood Park International festival ground.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:24, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:POWERHOUSE LOGO.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:POWERHOUSE LOGO.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Wikijib5.jpg


The file File:Wikijib5.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 January 2020 (UTC)