User talk:John mac2989

Speedy deletion nomination of Rational Survey


A tag has been placed on Rational Survey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Rorshacma (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I  had to delete the article. Please wait until you actually do have some content. What you will need is references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. Products should be described in general terms using as few adjectives as possible, giving their basic capabilities, but not the details, or the pricing. A guide is, that if it would be information useful only to a client or prospective client, it does not belong here. What belongs here is information relevant to someone who is not a prospective client, but wants to know what the product is. Details about the subscription limits are not really suitable. If you do not have such reviews or articles, there is no point trying until you do--the article will not be acceptable. Nothing "deserves" an article--as an encyclopedia, we write only about things that are already important.

I do not want to discourage you, but to urge you to write a proper article if it is possible; if it is not yet possible, please help us by improving our other articles on related topics.  DGG ( talk ) 23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)