User talk:John tecsosolutions

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, John tecsosolutions. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Tecso solutions, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 12:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tecso solutions, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 12:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  12:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Isn't this username compliant with the username policy on usernames that contain a business name? ("Name at Company Name") Unless I'm not seeing something you are. 331dot (talk) 12:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Normally, yeah (although we'd prefer something more like Johnattecso or John of Tecso); but this one was deleting maintenance templates, etc., so slack is not getting cut much here. (And I will admit that I am a big fan of WP:SOLUTIONS.) -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  22:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. I figured you had a good reason and I just didn't see it.  Best wishes 331dot (talk) 02:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)