User talk:Johncellis89

A tag has been placed on Four Clicks to Jesus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste: talk 00:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. --Blanchardb- Me  MyEarsMyMouth-timed 01:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Four clicks to jesus
You are correct about it not being patent nonsense. However, it does not address any evidence of notability, and that is also a reason for deletion. Please do not recreate it again without first discussing with other Wikipedians. Thank you. -- Gray  Porpoise  01:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Four clicks to jesus
A tag has been placed on Four clicks to jesus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WriterListener 01:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * There are now two possible spellings of the name of this article that are protected, and rather than fill up the protection page with variations on this theme, I thought I'd suggest that I see it as more appropriate to block you from making any future contributions unless you stop recreating this article. What path would you prefer?  Accounting4Taste: talk 01:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Four clicks to Jesus
A tag has been placed on Four clicks to Jesus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WriterListener 01:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Accounting4Taste: talk 01:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

4 clicks
Stop with that. It's not notable but it is unsourced and original research and will be deleted. And if you persist you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Kfrood for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WriterListener 02:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)