User talk:Johncraigjunior

Copyright issue with Zen Master Marlowe}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at :, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Jamoche 21:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Pat Enkyo O'Hara
I have added a "" template to the article Pat Enkyo O'Hara, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. &mdash;Dgiest c 06:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Addendum:

It might seem like I'm picking on you, but Wikipedia gets tons of biographical submissions for people who, quite frankly, are not important. She may well be a very important figure, but you need to provide some evidence of that since I doubt many people outside of her field have heard of her. Why is she special? Just because she studied under this famous guy? Has anyone written about her in books or magazines? Yes, there are other articles which don't properly show the importance of their subject, but Wikipedia editors are not perfect at catching everything; you just caught my attention because you created several articles in a short time. &mdash;Dgiest c 15:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Village Zendo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &mdash;Dgiest c 07:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

The Missing Person
The article The Missing Person has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 15:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Making multiple copies
So far you have made 4 different copies of the same page: Pat Enkyo O'Hara, Pat Enkyo O'Hara. (with period), Pat O'Hara. (with period), and Enkyo Pat O'Hara. Please don't do this. Wikipedia supports creating "redirects" to handle multiple possible titles of the same page. Please read WP:REDIRECT to learn more. &mdash;Dgiest c 07:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)