User talk:Johndoughertysutton

Greetings.

June 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vacchiano Farm have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at South Carolina Gamecocks football. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Associated Press NFL Comeback Player of the Year Award, you may be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C)  21:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

ITS TRUE THO Johndoughertysutton (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Eagles 24/7 (C)  05:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Eagles 24/7 (C)  05:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm CrystallineLeMonde. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Platypus have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 14:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jon Gruden, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank You! Swagging (talk) 01:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jon Gruden. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Swagging (talk) 01:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Tom Brady
Wikipedia policy is we do not update pages with transactions, including retirements, until either the team or the player makes the announcement. It doesn't matter how many NFL insiders "confirm" it or if the NFL Twitter page "confirms" it, we still wait.-- Rockchalk 717 20:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Your recent editing history at Matthew Stafford shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)