User talk:Johnfrazzini

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Ghost Hunters appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. &mdash; e. ripley\talk 04:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Ghost Hunters
I have removed the text you just inserted, again. Criticism is fine, but it has to be sourced to a reliable source. This is an encyclopedia, it's not the place for inserting our own opinions about things. I'd encourage you to read some of our policies, including those related to requiring that information be verifiable and properly sourced, and adhering to a neutral point of view. Thanks. &mdash; e. ripley\talk 05:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at User:Johnfrazzini. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 05:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Very sorry about that and will review the policy. You will not have to remove me from the site. It is just very frustrating with what has transpired with these guys and feel people are entitled to the truth. I am involved in the field and it was these guys that made it possible, but the credibility of these guys is questionable at best.

John Frazzini


 * It's okay, thanks a lot for your message. Please note that criticism can be and is included in the article, but it has to be properly sourced.  In some ways this is difficult for a topic such as this one, because our sourcing policy is strict and (properly) tilted toward very reliable sources -- think the New York Times, etc. -- but a topic like this often doesn't get covered in those kinds of publications.  So your challenge is to find already-published sources, which can be considered reliable, that cover the information you want to include in the article.  Let me know if you need help learning your way around. &mdash; e. ripley\talk 05:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)