User talk:Johngagon

I was looking through the list of wikipedians who had Asperger's Snydrome and noticed that you were in the military. Do they really let Autistic people into the services? Mrld 19:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Couldn't Find You
I couldn't find you on that site,guess you have to make an account first.I'm not really into bears,but it depends on what ya look like.Contact me on yahoo messenger: southernflboy or southernflboy@yahoo.com Natthegreat 09:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MV5BMTQxNTU1OTIxN15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzYyNzQ3MQ@@ V1 SX309 SY400 .jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MV5BMTQxNTU1OTIxN15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzYyNzQ3MQ@@ V1 SX309 SY400 .jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Patti Miner
I am replacing the notability tag on this page. If you look at the notability guidelines you'll see that appearing on a self-publish label like CD Baby is not one of the criteria. You need to find some reliable 3rd party sources to verify the claims of notabiilty. I am also removing the YouTube link again as I believe this is a copyright violation. I note from your username that your last name is Gagon, please be aware that you should avoid writing about subjects where you may have a conflict of interest. -- Deadly&forall;ssassin 02:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'll get some other sources.  I grew up in the area and am a fan of her music.

Possibly unfree Image:MV5BMTQxNTU1OTIxN15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzYyNzQ3MQ@@ V1 SX309 SY400 .jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MV5BMTQxNTU1OTIxN15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzYyNzQ3MQ@@ V1 SX309 SY400 .jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Deadly&forall;ssassin 02:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)  -- Deadly&forall;ssassin  02:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Response
I'll replace it ASAP with something that I have explicit permission for although I have implicit permission from the owner of the copyright for the current one. Johngagon (talk) 03:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * John, please click on the discussion link above and comment here. Otherwise, no one will see it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'm still learning a lot.

Speedy deletion nomination of Get equal


A tag has been placed on Get equal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.  role player 14:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * NB As is the page is likely to get deleted. If you have more info later in the week, you an re-create the article at that time. Travelbird (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Can I just reiterate what Travelbird has said above. It sounds like an excellent organisation, and if it is gaining notoriety then all the better for an article to exist about it.  However it is always better to have the full details before you create the article because unless you show the notability of the subject area it will be deleted.  I look forward to reading more about it when you have more details. --  role player 14:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * See WP:Notability for the standard you will have to meet if the article is to be kept: "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and press releases. More at WP:Notability (organizations and companies). If you want to take time to develop the article, you would do best to make a draft in your user space at User:Johngagon/Get equal. Good general advice at WP:Your first article. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:M72god.jpg


The file File:M72god.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)