User talk:Johnhart151/sandbox

Looks good! I've added some tags to draw your attention to areas of improvement. Who are you ? Please log in when you make edits so I can recognise your contributions. Comtebenoit (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

- This is AMAZING! Well done! You need to fix the reference list, quite a bit of wikiformatting not quite right there. Also, add a section at the end that is 'archaeological significance' and put in a few sentences of why this site is important in the region, ie. NOTABLE. Comtebenoit (talk) 05:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Since I know we're all going to be working on here, I figured I'd just send a message here rather than on canvas :) I went ahead and went through the article and corrected as much as I could, and I also integrated Higham's ideas and corrections that he emailed me back. They were all great, and really benefited what we have. Also, he said when he has the time in the future, he'll check back and make any corrections himself (is that cool or what!). So far, I think all we need to do is correct the references formatting, write the Archaeological significance at the bottom, and all of us should double check the rubric in case we forgot something.Rjmath (talk) 06:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Don't forget to sign your comments with four tildas like so ~ (the message above this is unsigned, I guess it was Rjmath?). Your article is really looking excellent. I have emailed some more detailed feedback to help you finish it off. Comtebenoit (talk) 06:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

I've tagged a few points in the Post-Khok Phanom Di section that need attention. Comtebenoit (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)