User talk:Johnkarp

Hi John. Since I didn't find an email address for you, I assume that you'll see this note if I post it here, and then you can delete it once you've read it. I appreciate your help with the categorization of the Choice Theory entry. I'm not entirely sure on what grounds you perfer "popular psychology" to "psychology" as a category -- the implication being that this is just popluar "stuff" but not to be taken seriously. And that I think is incorrect. Glasser is an MD and a board licensed psychiatrist with some 50+ years of clinical experience. He is certainly a recognized authority in his field. So, to categorize his work as "popular psychology" is perhaps a disservice to him and those who consult the Wikipedia. Have you read his recent (2003) book WARNING: Psychiatry Can Be Hazardous to Your Mental Health ? It's your edit and your call, so I'm not reverting it. Please think about it. Frank Ferguson: f2@cainc.com

Hello Johnkarp! welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Drop us a note at New user log so we can meet you and help you get started.

If you need editing help, visit How to edit a page. For format questions, visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump.

I see you have made several edits concerning dance. You may be interested in WikiProject Dance.

Have fun!--Fenice 19:04, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Fermentation
Hi- I liked your contributions to the Fermentation article and I was pleased to see the Steinkraus reference you added. He was my Master's thesis advisor at Cornell. I now work at the Agricultural research service on non-food topics, but I still haunt food-related wikipedia pages. Happy editing! ike9898 13:15, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)

Psychological/Psychiatric categories
Hi there, I notice you have been tweaking these categories. I had a go at doing a DSM type tree as you might have noticed. I have left a message on User talk:Sietse Snel that you might want to have a look at suggesting a way that both disciplines might access the categories. Sietse is a psychology student and I presume you in the psychology field also. You might like to join WikiProject Psychopathology. There is also a review page, WikiProject Psychopathology/Review where people can list what they are up to. All the best. --CloudSurfer 22:31, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Categories
Please create and populate categories in the form of a plural title. I've moved Category:Intimate relationship to Category:Intimate relationships Dysprosia 07:40, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Free-reed aerophones
I'm just wondering why you recategorized several free-reed musical instruments into a new category called "Sets of Free Reeds." Hornbostel-Sachs notwithstanding, I've never heard that category name in common use. See WP:NC and Naming conventions (common names).

Anyway, I do think that moving "Free-reed instruments" to "Free-reed aerophones" was a good choice. Maybe the instruments should be included in both "Free-reed aerophones" and "Sets of Free Reeds." --Theodore Kloba 18:28, 2004 Dec 30 (UTC)

English words of Indo-European origin
Hi, Johnkarp. Are you going to come back to this article? In a way it's your baby, so we need you to say something on its talkpage about where you think it is going. (You will have noticed that it has been renamed! My suggestion, though someone else did it.) --Doric Loon 14:15, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Hawthorne effect and Experimental design
Hello, John,

I'm working on the Hawthorne effect article and discovered the Category: Experiment design page that you created (I believe). I know nothing about experimental design, so I'd like to know what you think about adding the Hawthorne Effect to the list. DBlomgren 01:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of RealAge
A tag has been placed on RealAge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- WebHamste r  03:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Folk psychology
I have nominated folk psychology for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Mattisse (Talk) 14:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Psychology societies
Category:Psychology societies, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 19:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Johnkarp! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Warda Al-Jazairia -

Speedy deletion nomination of Warda Al-Jazairia
A tag has been placed on Warda Al-Jazairia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gigs (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Love styles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love styles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Love styles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 02:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Biopsychology has been nominated for discussion
Category:Biopsychology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:Eye has been nominated for discussion
Category:Eye, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 20:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)