User talk:Johnkiln

Welcome!
Hello, Johnkiln, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! JarrahTree 02:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

The Loaded Dog
The problem is that you are adding anecdotal items to an under-referenced article,

and it will seem as if you are simply following the precedent.

The actual story is in WP:SOURCE and the claims for the plot, the text, and the attributes of the story and its legacy are not cited adequately (as in WP:RS) all basically WP:OR - which means that it is a very poor example of an article to start editing - there is inadequate separation between the text, the attributions. The point of view is another thing again. JarrahTree 02:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm That Tired Tarantula. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Loaded Dog seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. That Tired Tarantula  Burrow  01:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Loaded Dog. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. That Tired Tarantula  Burrow  02:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Loaded Dog, you may be blocked from editing. That Tired Tarantula  Burrow  22:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)