User talk:Johnmadera

April 2011
Hello Johnmadera. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. 99.155.207.91 (talk) 19:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Concerns re: self-promotion of essays and blogsite
I've asked for discussion re: your addition of external links at this noticeboard. Please feel free to comment there. 99.155.207.91 (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Please note that the links have been removed due to concerns over self-promotion. It would be better if you discussed this first. --Ckatz chat spy  05:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Ryder (January 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamela Ryder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  21:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pamela Ryder has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pamela Ryder. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  01:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Ryder (January 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamela Ryder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 04:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Ryder has been accepted
 Pamela Ryder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 01:03, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: John H. Falk has been accepted
 John H. Falk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  05:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Proposed deletion of Kurt Baumeister


The article Kurt Baumeister has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No coverage in independent reliable sources. There's a few reviews of his book, Pax Americana, in reliable sources, but not enough to meet WP:NAUTHOR. Probably WP:TOOSOON, may become notable once he's written some more books."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed,Rosguill talk 22:14, 7 December 2018 (UTC)