User talk:Johnnybgoode100

April 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Present (book), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ''The tags you removed reflected valid concerns from the editor's community. They should be addressed in the talk page before removing. WingtipvorteX   PTT''   ∅  22:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of The Present (book) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Present (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Present (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  23:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Verifiablility
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia has a fairly strict policy on verifiability. Basically undocumented and unverifiable claims are usually deleted from articles. I'd suggest giving the above link a quick read if you intend to continue editing. Other good reading would be WP:RS and WP:NPOV. ~Adjwilley (talk) 22:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)