User talk:Johnnyfaviero

October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=628394359 your edit] to Call It Whatever (song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * }

November 2014
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 01:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 01:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 01:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Repeated addition of unreferenced data. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ron h jones (Talk) 15:56, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bradley Steven Perry, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing again, this time for a longer period, for continuing disruptive editing, including persistently adding doubtful unsourced content to articles. (Also, you should be aware that repeatedly reverting to your own preferred version of an article in the face of other editors changing it (known as edit warring), as you did at Demi Lovato, is considered disruptive, and can lead to being blocked. On this occasion, you did this only to a very small extent, and I would not have blocked you just for that, but it all adds to the impression that you are less willing to edit collaboratively than would be desirable.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Sourcing
Per WP:Verifiability and WP:No original research, you MUST provide citations to reliable sources when adding or changing content. This particularly applies for pages on living people. Continuing to add unsourced/poorly sourced content is disruptive. You've been warned about this before, so don't be surprised if you get blocked again for further unreferenced additions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  16:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Hmmmm...
I'm not sure whether or not to give you a warning not to vandalize articles, or to thank you for making a new article. On the one hand, you seem to have a history of being banned for disruptive editing, on the other hand, you are the one who created the article in question, Austin & Ally: Take It from the Top, and you seem to at least have put decent (albeit unsourced) information there. Please note that your last edit messed up the formatting pretty bad. You might want to try writing the article in your user sandbox, or start it as Draft first, before publishing it, so you don't have to faff around with the formatting and potentially break everything on the page. Oh, and one more thing, can you find any citations to show that this is actually a thing, that the information in the articles correct? Verifiability of the information in an article is very important on Wikipedia. Sarr <b style="color: #CC5500;background:#FFD700">Cat</b> ∑;3 01:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, I see you fixed the formatting. Next time you create an article, try creating it as a draft, so you can tweak it without raising suspicion of vandalism. Thanks! Sarr <b style="color: #CC5500;background:#FFD700">Cat</b> ∑;3 01:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 02:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:.  K rakatoa    K atie   04:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liv and Maddie: Music from the TV Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cloud 9. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Scream Queens (2015 TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Callmemirela  {Talk}   &#9809;  01:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lindsay Lohan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scream Queens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. 5 albert square (talk) 12:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruby Rose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Around the Block. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. ''You've been repeatedly told in the past to include citations to reliable sources in the past and still appear to be disregarding previous warnings and blocks. You WILL be reported again if this keeps up.'' <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 02:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Re: TV films
TV films belong in the television section of an actor's filmography - see WP:FILMOGRAPHY. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 00:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)


 * @Materialscientist, I was looking for the block log and I realised that in the summary you have mentioned only two words "same behaviour". Some explanation in the form of phrase or few more words would have helped. Though it's a old thing and you might not have used such a short summary again but I thought I should inform you, if that helps us by anyway. Thanks and let me know if I am wrong in understanding this situation. <span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">QueerEcofeminist🌈  03:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)