User talk:Johnnyrocket2009

Charles Mertens de Wilmars
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Cathardic (talk) 21:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Charles Mertens de Wilmars, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 21:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Charles Mertens de Wilmars, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 21:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Charles Mertens de Wilmars, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Mertens de Wilmars
A tag has been placed on Charles Mertens de Wilmars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Favonian (talk) 21:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)