User talk:Johno4302

Speedy deletion nomination of Editing of NF1 mRNA
A tag has been placed on Editing of NF1 mRNA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hairhorn (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RNA editing of IGFBP7 mRNA


A tag has been placed on RNA editing of IGFBP7 mRNA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of RNA editing of IGFBP7 mRNA and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kamkek (talk) 17:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at RNA editing of IGFBP7 mRNA
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from RNA editing of IGFBP7 mRNA, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Johno4302, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Paul (talk) 23:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Suggestion
Hi Johno4302, thanks for all your contributions. I have a suggestion however - instead of creating a separate article for the RNA editing of a particular gene, maybe just include this information in the article about the gene. It's generally better to have fewer articles that are detailed rather than many that are short. Let me know if you have any questions. SmartSE (talk) 01:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree with Smartse. I think you're making some very useful contributions to Wikipedia. I do think it would be better if these editing articles were sections within the corresponding gene article, rather than a separate article.--Paul (talk) 07:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Page titles
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give RNA editing of IGFBP7 mRNA a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into IGFBP7 RNA EDITING. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

FLNA
Hi. Thanks for your contributions to the FLNA article. However I see that you have undone the edits I have made. First of all, when you undo someone else edits, it is especially important that you briefly state your reasons for the revert in the edit summary. The reason for my edit was stated in my edit summary. In more detail, according to WP:HEAD, section heading should be concise and subheading should not repeat words that are included in the headings. Also per this discussion, the PBB controls and templates are obsolete and we are in the process of systematically removing them. Boghog (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Citation suggestion
In case you haven't already seen this, please check out User:Diberri's Wikipedia template filling tool (instructions). Given a PubMed ID, one can quickly produce a full citation that can be copied and pasted into a Wikipedia article. If you want to include the citation "in-line", be sure that the "add ref tag" option of the template tool is turned on. If you want to include a reference in the further reading section, the "add ref tag" option should be left off. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 21:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

SPRED1 gene
Hi Johno,

Thanks for your work on rna editing for nf1 gene.

If you have similar info for SPRED1 gene, could you please add it to that page?

Also, if you know of publicly readable nonprofit databases for nf1 and spred1 gene mutations, could you please add links to those pages?

Thanks, Erxnmedia (talk) 18:18, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)