User talk:Johnreed

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Sandbox for test edits. Tvoz | talk 21:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree with the deletion of this section on the grounds that it is being given way more space than it deserves. These are allegations and as such it is a clear unbridled attempt to slander a man with someone else's words. If mentioned at all it deserves no more that two or three sentences at most. This is an unfair attack on this candidate and it is now consuming a significant portion of the total page. Absolutely rediculous! Anappealtoheaven 03:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If you feel that way, discuss it on Talk. Edit warring is not going to do it. Tvoz | talk 09:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Tvoz | talk 00:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry that you've ignored the warnings and refused to discuss this or even leave an edit summary explanation. Edit warring is not the way to accomplish something on wikipedia. Try persuasion, logic, discussion, compromise. Tvoz | talk 09:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Three revert rule violation
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Sam Blacketer 09:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Republican Liberty Caucus
I have nominated an article to which you have contributed for deletion, because of its lack of citations, despite a request for sources dating back to June 2007. If this nomination is in error, then please post a message to Articles for deletion/Republican Liberty Caucus; you may also wish to add a bibliography or footnotes to the Republican Liberty Caucus article, as well. Thank you. Bjenks (talk) 02:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)