User talk:Johnsmith9450

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Seasons of War has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Seasons of War was changed by Johnsmith9450 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877043 on 2014-12-24T06:00:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Haminoon (talk) 07:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Mark Clattenburg
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mark Clattenburg, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Mark Clattenburg. Thank you. QED237&#160;(talk) 11:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Clattenburg. QED237&#160;(talk) 16:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mark Clattenburg shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">QED</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 13:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Myles Ponsonby. Bevo74 (talk) 13:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)