User talk:Johnson gracee/sandbox

Peer Review
First, I would like to apologize for this review being a week late!

I think your were smart when picking your edits. The article did need a lot of work and you identified the areas that were lacking. I think thoroughly explaining restricted and elaborated code was needed, and adding examples of each works well. The only note I have is in the "The Codes and child development" section, there is one sentence that says "As such, it may be beneficial..." The way this sentence is worded makes it sound more like opinion than fact. If it is a fact, I would just reword it and possibly cite Bernstein.

Overall, I thought you did an excellent job not only identifying the trouble areas, but your edit is well written!