User talk:Johnstiltner

Recent edit to Rendering equation
Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Rendering equation article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Leschnei (talk) 14:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rendering equation has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rendering equation was changed by Johnstiltner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929839 on 2016-12-12T15:23:56+00:00.

Johnstiltner, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. RSTech1 (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rendering equation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Jacona (talk) 19:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Equation has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Equation was changed by Johnstiltner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970043 on 2017-01-05T14:09:25+00:00.

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Embargo Act of 1807 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Embargo Act of 1807 was changed by Johnstiltner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940179 on 2017-01-24T15:54:32+00:00.

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Embargo Act of 1807 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Embargo Act of 1807 was changed by Johnstiltner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954034 on 2017-01-31T01:08:06+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Security hacker. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Security hacker was changed by Johnstiltner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953496 on 2017-01-31T01:17:44+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alphabet Inc., you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Alphabet Inc. was changed by Johnstiltner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972967 on 2017-01-31T16:09:59+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alphabet Inc.. ⁓ Hello  71  16:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text below. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)