User talk:Johntex/Talk24

Delinking dates on your user page
Shouldn't the dates be delinked on your user page in the Milestones in Edit Count section as per mosnum?-- PremKudva    Talk   03:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Greetings - thanks for your message!
 * As you may know, MOSNUM previously recommended that they be linked. Given that opinion swayed from one way to the other, I am anticipating it may swing back the other way.  Hence, I am not investing time to go change all the dates.  Cheers, Johntex\talk 14:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football December 2008 Newsletter
The December 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Texas Longhorns
Hi John, just to give you a heads up, as you seem to be the primary contributor to the series of articles, I plan on going ahead with the move of the Texas Longhorns football seasons articles to the plural form. You didn't seem to feel too strongly one way or the other on the talk page. I think the move is important because it keeps consistency across the Wikiproject College football's articles. I'll leave a redirect from the singular.

By the way, outstanding job on those UT team articles. You've set the standard for those of us who work on cfb team articles.

Strikehold (talk) 17:35, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Strikehold, thanks for the heads-up about the page moves. I appreciate the courtesy even though of course I don't own the articles.  It is always nice when someone takes the time to not only discuss their proposal, as you did on the Talk page, but also to notify the major contributor(s) as well.


 * Thanks for the compliment also. I think they are in pretty good shape overall, though of course I know they have some room for improvement always.  The 2007 article may be close to FA quality.  I was working it up in the off-season but I ran out of time when the new season started.


 * Is there a bot yet to fix all the articles to keep them from pointing to the redirects, or do we still have to do that manually? That work is rather tedious, but it should really be done if we are moving the pages.  Best, Johntex\talk 19:40, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

I miss your edits to the Texas Longhorns football season page. So far we just have a skeleton page for 2011. - Bevo (talk) 18:09, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

The Special Barnstar

 * Thanks very much!! Johntex\talk 02:50, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

==Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Texas Flag at DKR - North Texas vs Texas 2006.jpg== Thank you for uploading Image:Texas Flag at DKR - North Texas vs Texas 2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 06:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

New CFB FAC
Since you're on the CFB FAC task force, I figured I'd better let you know that 2006 Gator Bowl is now a featured article candidate. Anything you'd be able to add to the conversation would be appreciated. Thanks! JKBrooks85 (talk) 07:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

College football AfD's
I would really appreciate your input in these open AfD discussions. Thanks in advance. BlueAg09 (Talk) 09:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Arbcom elections
Hi,

As a fellow participant in the Scouting Project, I just wanted to remind you that the Arbcom election closes today. Our lead coord, Rlevse, is one of the candidates running for arbitrator. Editors who wish to vote for or against candidates may do so at Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote within the next six hours.

Cheers,  JGHowes   talk  17:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Request for Comment on College Football logos
Users opposing the use of College Football team logos being used in articles through out the College Football project have filed a Request for Comment trying to ban use of team logos. As I am sure you know our current standard/system of using logos legitimately with fair use rationales do not violate any wikipedia policy. It would be appreciated if you could take a moment and voice you opinion on the subject here: RFC: Use of logos on sports team pages. Thank you in advance and thank you for your contributions to the College Football Project. Rtr10 (talk) 04:48, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats on the win, but in the subject above, they again seem to be claiming consensus and acting upon it. I do not believe they have such consensus. Your thoughts? — BQZip01 —  talk 05:35, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

List of Texas Aggie terms renaming
Howdy Johntex. The List of Texas Aggie terms is up at featured list candidates. On the talk page, there is a discussion about what the correct name of the article should be. Your input on the matter would be much appreciated. Thanks and Gig em! Oldag07 (talk) 23:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

New straw poll
You are a user who responded to Use of logos on sports team pages. As someone interested in the discussion a new straw poll has been laid out to see where we currently stand with regards to building a consensus. For the sake of clarity, please indicate your support or opposition (or neutrality) to each section, but leave discussion to the end of each section. — BQZip01 — talk 23:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject College football January 2009 Newsletter
The January 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

List of Texas Aggie Terms
The page you started the List of Texas Aggie terms has been promoted to FL status! Gig 'em Ags! Hook 'em Horns!Oldag07 (talk) 04:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Porn
Could you add your thoughts to this please? Thanks, Dismas |(talk) 04:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Request peer review
Hey, Johntex. I was wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a look at 2008 Humanitarian Bowl, an article I've been working on recently and plan to put up as a FA candidate. Thanks. Strikehold (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject College football February 2009 Newsletter
The February 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Cardiology task force
Maen. K. A. (talk) 23:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kelby Shults alleged harrasement incident
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kelby Shults alleged harrasement incident, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * There is no good reason to keep this account of an unproven allegation against a school student.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kevin (talk) 11:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

New image project
Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects WikiProject Free images, WikiProject Fair use, WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kelby Shults alleged harrasment incident
I have nominated Kelby Shults alleged harrasment incident, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Kelby Shults alleged harrasment incident. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kevin (talk) 21:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

BCS
I thought this might interest you. Hook 'em! JCDenton2052 (talk) 18:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't wait until next season, but I'm afraid that because of our weak SOS, even if we run the table, USC and Florida (or some other SEC team) may edge us out if they also run the table. Yet more reason for a playoff. JCDenton2052 (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Formal Mediation for Sports Logos
As a contributor to Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos/Archive_1, I have included you in a request for formal mediation regarding the subject at Requests for mediation/Use of Sports Logos. With your input and agreement to work through mediation, I hope we can achieve a lasting solution. — BQZip01 — talk 06:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You're probably pretty busy, but I'm glad to see you back. Thanks! — BQZip01 —  talk 04:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies
Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 17:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Request for mediation not accepted
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

coat of arms of Malta
What did you mean that there were 8 turrets, but only 5 of them were visible? Then doesn't that mean the coat of arms only shows 5 turrets? --208.184.57.69 (talk) 15:51, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

2005 Oklahoma vs. Texas football game GA Sweeps: On Hold
I have reviewed 2005 Oklahoma vs. Texas football game for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject University of Texas at Austin Collaboration for August 2009
WP:UT's first priority is getting the flagship article (UT Austin) back to GA status and ultimately, FA status. So lets take this in baby steps and focus on one section at a time, and what better section the the first: history! Any contributions would be appreciated and... Hook 'em Horns! NThomas (talk) 00:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of David Heymann
I have reassessed the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. There are some concerns which you can see at Talk:David Heymann/GA1. If these are not addressed, the article will be de-listed. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Hoi polloi
The article Hoi polloi, to which you seem to be one of the primarily contributors, is undergoing a review as part of the good article sweeps project. The article does not seem to meet current requirements for a good article. It has been put on hold for a week; if these issues are addressed satisfactorily within that period the article will be kept as a GA, otherwise it will be delisted. Lampman (talk) 13:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

File:SI cover 1973 10 10 Hook em horns.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:SI cover 1973 10 10 Hook em horns.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Brian Reading (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC) Brian Reading (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

FAR Baby Gender Mentor
nominated Baby Gender Mentor for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

Regards, &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 22:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If you revert the tags that Identify the problems, then you will have to go through each reference separately as I did, to identtify to issues. I recomment that you not revert again. In any event, I have linked to the article paage the version that identifies the link problems relevant to Far. Regards, &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 01:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

MILHIST admins
Hi. Since you're an admin and a member of the Military History WikiProject, feel free to list yourself here. Cheers, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 19:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Happy 's Day!
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:14, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:31, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Aggie Bonfire for TFA
I was reading through the Aggie Bonfire talk page archives to see if there would be anyone in there interested putting Aggie Bonfire up for request as a featured article on the 10-year anniversary. If you are interested, I'm trying to build a bit of a coalition before the time for nominations opens up: User:BQZip01/TFA request; add your signature if interested. — BQZip01 — talk 20:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting elections
You are receiving this notice as an active member of WikiProject Scouting. To change your status as a member, please edit WikiProject Scouting/Members.

Rlevse is retiring as our lead coordinator; see Stepping down as ScoutingWikiProject Lead Coordinator. Election for a new coordinator will be held after the new year. If you are interested in nominating yourself or another editor, please add the name to Project coordinator election.

Yours in Scouting

---— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 16:45, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Mason Moore
Sir, I need your Help over this issue, As per Articles for deletion/Mason Moore for Mason Moore, the reason stated "No significant coverage" and non compliance with WP:PORNBIO, but i would like to express my view over the issue, That i had gone through the Actress profile well, Though she is new to this genre,but still She has been covered significant under what exactly we call for Porn actress, she is not an actress from Hollywood, so we might call for significant status for her. As stated in WP:PORNBIO, Though she had not won a well-known award, such as those listed in Category:Pornographic film awards or Category:Film awards. but she had been covered & nominated in AVN Awards like that of AVN Hall of Fame. & she had contributed a lot in Porn Industry at such a little time. Well the aforementioned details are formalised, & the informal one is that, i am new to wikipedia, & would to like contribute for my lifetime, so i am looking for your positive response over this issue, Please assist me. Thanks. (   Abu Torsam    12:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC))

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Seventy-two suburbs in search of a city
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — The Man in Question (in question)  22:46, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Johntex! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Veronika Vařeková -
 * 2) Enda Marren -
 * 3) Fernando Jara -

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Could you pop over to ejaculation discussion page?
Sorry to trouble you with this old dispute, I had been going through the archives and had noticed you had been involved in the discussion.

Consensus is close on the video, but some photos have been put back into the page (Atom has lost the plot on this one). The photos have by Infofreak been shown to be pornographic and exhibitionist, and I agree. Not only that while there is the possibility them being put back it is more difficult to get consensus on the video. It is just starting to hit me why this is so difficult. If the pics go we can move toward consensus on the video. Info has said he would delete them, but Atom is still questioning why here. It is proven that the same person who uploaded them has similar stuff on a pay-per-view porn site. Whoever this guy is he is getting mileage out of having them here. They need to go, and from WP Commons too if possible.

Kind Regards

Derek DMSBel (talk) 21:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pearl necklace (sexuality)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Pearl necklace (sexuality). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Pearl necklace (sexuality) (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
Several years ago, you were involved in a deletion review on Directional Michigan. Here is the original discussion. A new proposal for deletion has come up and you are invited to participate here.

This note is being posted on the talk pages of everyone involved in that discussion that still has an active account. Feel free to express your opions for or against deletion as you see fit.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

WIKIPROJECT OKLAHOMA
-- Steam   Iron  22:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jevan Snead
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jevan Snead. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Jevan Snead (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of War Chant
I have nominated War Chant, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/War Chant. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. causa sui (talk) 00:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:34, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 19:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1997 Michigan Wolverines football team/archive1‎
As the author of one of the only two college football season WP:FAs, I thought I would call your attention to Featured article candidates/1997 Michigan Wolverines football team/archive1‎. Feel free to comment.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

File:BCS national championship trophy and Bevo.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BCS national championship trophy and Bevo.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Mosmof (talk) 02:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Texas Longhorn football
Hi John, Can you change the name of the page to "Texas Longhorns Football" so it comes up cleanly on my facebook page? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Insan38 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:41, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Stockings
I know this goes back a few years, but when you created File:Fishnet stockings from below.jpg, how did you determine they were stockings and not some other form of hosiery? The source does not appear to say either way. --Juventas (talk) 23:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * You replied that they're tagged on Flickr as stockings. I'm probably being dense, but the tags I see on Flickr are "legsproject, legs, fencenets (not fishnets), orange tutu, NSFWWISNTT, tutu, top-v555, leg".  If the author has tagged them as "fishnet stockings", that would be good information. --Juventas (talk) 01:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free content usage
There is an issue involving non-free content usage on the US Presidents on US postage stamps discussion page. As you are an administrator with a lot of dealings in non-free content disputes I am hoping you can weigh in on a matter. I created the US Presidents on US postage stamps page back in June of 2010. Most of the page's images are of postage stamps issued before 1978, in the public domain, that depict US presidents, however stamps issued after 1978 are not in the public domain and any images must be used under non-free content guide lines. The page has 17 NFC images, each image used in reference to a different topic/president. As the page subject is about presidential stamps, each image is necessary and is so defined in fair-use rationale. -- A day ago (Jan.11) I was told by a user:hammersoft that the article has too many NFC images and he referred me to Non-free image use policy, items 3 and 8. This wiki'reference speaks about multiple NFC images used for one topic. This reference also doesn't speak of an overall flat limit on NFC images, but instead speaks of conditions regarding their usage. In any case, this sort of gets into a gray area. There is a discussion already underway on the page linked to. Any advice and consensus you can offer would be most appreciated here. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Texan Collaboration Notice
The Texan Collaboration Notice on the main page of WikiProject Texas has apparently been directed to Marshall, Texas since 2007. It has been my impression, based on the talk page and absence of certain editors, that the Texas project has not been really active in quite some time. Maybe individuals are working on Texas pages. But as a project, nothing looks like it's happened for a while. Given that, I wonder if it serves any purpose to have that outdated Collaboration Notice template on the main page of the Project. Maile66 (talk) 16:35, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

"Super Adobe" page
Hello, I'm a new contributor, hoping to improve the page on Super Adobe. There are many changes needed as it says, and it will take some time, but I'll do my best to help out where I can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earthbuilder82 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Texas Flag at DKR - North Texas vs Texas 2006.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Texas Flag at DKR - North Texas vs Texas 2006.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 16:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:02, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tabasco needs your help.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tabasco needs your help.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:58, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tabasco Nos Necesita.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tabasco Nos Necesita.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 03:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Gator Chomp for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gator Chomp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gator Chomp until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zeng8r (talk) 01:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Houston Ice Cream
I enjoyed your "Houston Ice Cream" contribution to the Trademark page. Thanks for your work.Bluej100 (talk) 23:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

AFD Discussion
FYI: There is an AFD discussion at Articles for deletion/Directional Michigan (3rd nomination) you may be interested in. You participated in previous discussions on the topic, so I am sending you a notification.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of War Chant


The article War Chant has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established, subject not clear, no sources added in three years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Exok (talk) 20:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:17, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:22, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This is TheOneQ and I have a small request in regards to getting pornography pages posted on Wikipedia. I see you are an administrator and work with the WikiProject Pornography group and would like your advice/opinion.

I have tried to get several pages posted on certain pornstars/movies, but they keep getting rejected. To my knowledge, I am following the verifiability and notability requirements for these performers, but they keep getting rejected.

For example, I recently attempted to write a page on the gay pornstar Spencer Reed. He is regarded in the industry as one of its fastest rising stars and he has notability to prove his placement on Wikipedia by way of his numerous award nominations and wins.

XBIZ, the industry leader on news and information related to pornography, awarded him the Gay Performer of the Year, 2011. In addition, he has been nominated for several GayVN Awards, honoring the best in gay pornography. GayVN is part of AVN, a trade magazine also recognized in the industry as a reputable source.

My listing included four sources. Two of them were from XBIZ: one showing a listing of the 2011 award winners and the other a profile feature written on him and published in their magazine. Another source was from AVN and showed a listing for the awards he was nominated for. The final source was from IAFD (Internet Adult Film Database), showing a breakdown of all of Spencer's official appearances. I also want to note that AVN, XBIZ and IAFD are all listed in the WikiProject Pornography page as "Useful Links"

Despite only citing reputable sources within the field and (to my understanding of it) showing notability, the page was still rejected. The notice stated, "We're sorry, but we cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy."

I don't want to this opening message to be too long, but any help you can provide to get this page and others posted would be greatly appreciated. I want to follow everything necessary for publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheOneQ (talk • contribs) 15:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Texas Exes


The article Texas Exes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 18:38, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Texas Exes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Texas Exes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Texas Exes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TM 14:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:41, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:01, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:18, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 14:52, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject University of Texas at Austin
Template:WikiProject University of Texas at Austin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kumioko (talk) 02:01, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:27, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:56, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 06:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 03:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:42, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Medicine
Hi I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page. Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders. Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 17:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe   Epsilon  15:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

attribution for photographs
Hi Johntex, This is probably not the right forum for this conversation, but I wasn't sure how else to contact you.

I am interested in using a photo you took, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pink_knitting_in_front_of_pink_sweatshirt.JPG,

on our library website, http://www.ilsleypubliclibrary.org/event/advanced-beginners-knitting-group/2012-11-19/ But I am a little unclear on what the proper attribution is for this and other creative commons photos. Does this look okay to you?

You can reach me at info@ilsleypubliclibrary.org

Thanks, Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.233.99.201 (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Administrators&oldid=526254016#Restoration_of_the_tools_.28proposal.29 recent change] to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FT9708.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:FT9708.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:52, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

You okay?
Last edit was 3 years 3 months ago... just checking up on thing. - RoyBoy 22:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

...
Please check out WikiProject Council/Proposals/Collegiate sports (USA)... GWFrog (talk) 15:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Three Stooges Hoi Polloi Screenshot 1935.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Three Stooges Hoi Polloi Screenshot 1935.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BioTronics


The article BioTronics has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * I can find no record of this company's existence on the web. There was a postcard page, found in the Wayback machine, in 2008 under amplisensor.com, with only a home page. Most of the concrete information in this article suggests that this company is at best a failure and possibly a scam. There are other more established companies named BioTronics in the US, an instrumentation company in Pittsburgh and an ag company in Iowa. Accugen, its other ID, is also a more established company elsewhere in the US. AmpliSensor is the name of another product produced by a German company. The article's Biotronics supposed address, 50 Stedman in Lowell, MA, does not even exist on Google Maps. (Addresses go 44-46-48-54 there.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Doprendek (talk) 16:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SBC Red River Rivalry 100 year logo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:SBC Red River Rivalry 100 year logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BioTronics


The article BioTronics has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "An unremarkable company; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up are passing mentions or PR-driven -- insufficient to meet WP:CORPDEPTH."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:40, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of BioTronics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BioTronics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/BioTronics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)