User talk:Johnthebaptist1234

Speedy deletion nomination of Protestant hymns


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Protestant hymns requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  20:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Protestant hymns


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Protestant hymns requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Stang   13:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Information orange.svg Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Protestant hymns. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Protestant hymns, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 14:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Some advice
The page you have created is nowhere near ready to be an encyclopaedia article, which is why it has been tagged for speedy deletion. You should instead try starting a draft article so that you can work on it over time, find reliable sources, and get feedback from other editors before submitting the draft for review so it can become an article. Continuing to revert other editors without reading the articles linked and taking time to understand what is happening will only lead to you not being able to edit wikipedia which is not a great outcome for anyone. Melcous (talk) 14:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. An edit that you recently made to Gospel music seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)