User talk:Johnthunder2014

I was unaware putting acurate information in a global database was disruptive. But after further research I found the topic of ex gays is very important, with over 3 million ex gays in the US alone. While the information has been suppressed, the suppresion on Wikipedia has garnered me leverage with the Library of Congress Sup Doc and four medical boards. While new to Wikipedia, we have all inadvertantly help solidify Ex Gays as a formal organization and we should all be proud.

November 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Additionally, please don't use sockpuppet accounts, it's not very convincing and won't help you. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 16:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Nat Gertler (talk) 18:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

How to edit Wikipedia
You can't just go to Wikipedia articles and put whatever you want on them. You also can't just revert back to your brand-new version. If you don't like what is on the Ex-gay article and if you find people are reverting your changes, then you need to go to Talk:Ex-gay and actually discuss the changes you want to make with other editors. Just Tidying Up (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Blocked as a block-evading account of User:Seasonalweathers ~Adjwilley (talk) 06:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)