User talk:Johnxup6

Welcome!

Hello, Johnxup6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Square Tomato, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ttonyb (talk) 04:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Square Tomato
A tag has been placed on Square Tomato requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 04:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

The Room
Hi there! Great to see someone return to Wikipedia after a decade away. I really hate to revert your second ever edit, but I felt it didn't comply with our policy on reliable sources and self-published sources. Wikipedia has no way to assess the reliability of user ratings on other sites, and our guideline on IMDb (and essay on it) discourage citing IMDb ratings. (taste.io, meanwhile, does not seem to have any sizable footprint as a source at all.) That said, I understand that you're discussing the ratings themselves, and I think that if you could find a reliable source discussing those ratings and analyzing the polarization that your edit described, that would be a fine thing to add. Otherwise, I worry that we also run afoul of the policy on synthesis.

I hope you decide to stick around. I understand it's frustrating to have one of your first edits reverted. If you have any questions at all, please don't hesitate to reply here or on my talk page. -- Tamzin (they/she) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 20:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)