User talk:JointStature

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Chucky Styles has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): [a-z][0-9]+\.photobucket\.com/albums/.*\.(?:jpg|jpeg|gif|png|svg) (links: http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa62/lovecjd2007/chuck-sd.jpg). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 02:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I think that's a bit bite-y, don't you? I mean, I still think the article should be deleted as a recreation, but all he really did in that edit was try to add a table. It looks like he didn't know what he was doing with it, so at worst it's probably a test edit. --IllaZilla (talk) 02:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * My warning and reversion were done by mistake. Please accept my apologies. J.delanoy gabs adds  02:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Struck my previous comment as the warning I was referring to has been removed. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a hangon template to an article. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. --IllaZilla (talk) 19:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

DGAF
Wikipedia has strict notability/inclusion criteria for what can and what cannot have articles on the project. The issue is not whether any of what you wrote was true, but rather whether or not the group is "notable" to Wikipedia's standards. Please read WP:MUSIC for notability requirements for musical groups. It lists specific criteria that must be met for a group to have an article on the project. If DGAF meets one of these criteria, and you can provide reliable, independent, non-trivial sourcing to establish that the criteria have been met, then you likely could get an article to remain. If you cannot show that the criteria are met, then the deletion debate for the previous version of the article is going to stand, and no article will be on the project. Sorry. - TexasAndroid (talk) 05:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * TexasAndroid's response is pretty dead-on. You may have noticed when you went to create the DGAF article that a big red box appears, telling you that there was already an article by this title and that it was deleted. If you encounter this, you should read the deletion discussions linked in the red box. In this case it's Articles for deletion/DGAF. If you feel that you can write a new version of the article that addresses the reasons that it was deleted, you can ask the deleting admin (Yamamoto Ichiro in this case) to restore it for you in your userspace so that you can work on it. In wiki-slang this is called "userfying" an article. It will be placed in a subpage of your userpage, like User:JointStature/DGAF. Then you can work on it until you feel it is ready to be moved back into the article namespace.


 * In writing/improving the article you should focus on finding reliable sources to verify the information in it. It is especially important to find coverage in secondary sources to show that the subject is notable. Then you'll need to cite those sources in the article. Here are the core policies and guidelines that you should be aware of if you choose to keep working on this:
 * Verifiability
 * No original research
 * Biographies of living persons - since this is about an active group made up of living people
 * Notability
 * Notability (music) - more specific notability guidelines for musicians/bands/ensembles
 * Reliable sources
 * Citing sources
 * Read those first, and see if you think you can make the DGAF article meet the criteria expressed in them. Obviously not all Wikipedia articles are "born" completely meeting these standards, but when we're dealing with an article that's already been deleted by consensus because it failed to meet them, then it needs to be demonstrated that it could meet them if we're even going to consider allowing a new article about the same subject.
 * Once you've added a few sources, at least enough to establish the notability of the group, then you can move it back into the article namespace by copy/pasting the text into DGAF. Be sure to explain in your edit summary that you've been working on the article and added references to it; that way people will know that you haven't simply recreated the same content that was previously deleted.
 * I hope that helps. As a last note, and to make things simpler, I suggest reading Your first article and just following the steps outlined there. --IllaZilla (talk) 22:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suburban Noize Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prevail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC)