User talk:Jokestress/2012

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Lito Calzado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

San Francisco meetup at WMF headquarters
Hi Jokestress,

I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the next wiki-meetup happening in SF. It'll be located at our very own Wikimedia Foundation offices, and we'd love it if some local editors who are new to the meetup scene came and got some free lunch with us :) Please sign up on the meetup page if you're interested in attending, and I hope to see you soon! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Revere, Missouri citations
Brew8028 (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Thanks for your interest in the Revere, Missouri article. In regards to your request for additional citations, much of the historic information for Revere was gleaned from an unpublished book that I was able to review from a visit I had with a long-time Revere resident currently living in the Clark County Senior Housing development in Kahoka. I'm sorry that this book is not in an electronic format to allow for direct reference. If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know.

Brew8028

page about Jim Mitteager and the changes I suggested
Hi - I just saw your message to me about the modification of the page on Jim Mitteager. I am his daughter (is that reliable enough?) and he did not die of lung cancer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wendyhop (talk • contribs) 21:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

The article published in the Los Angeles magazine is incorrect. We are the Mitteager family and know the truth. I will keep changing the page.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wendyhop (talk • contribs) 22:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

This is typical of media. Incorrect information is published, and journalists continue to spread it. I am Wendy Mitteager, his daughter. I only know of the information published that is incorrect based on interviews with Barresi. Barresi did not tell the truth.

I have seen on Wikipedia "disputed information" - if you insist on including false information on this page, you must say it is disputed. Or omit the information.

I will continue to delete this information as he is my father and I owe it to him to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wendyhop (talk • contribs) 23:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Why do you care so much about publishing false information about my father? I don't understand your relationship to this information.

I am just trying to correct false information.

You reported me to another user? I didn't do anything wrong. You are wrong because you are perpetuating false information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wendyhop (talk • contribs) 23:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Andrea
Hi Andrea. I reverted WLU and Bali ultimate's edits to your BLP, and I have sided with you at the Neutral point of view noticeboard. I hope this is what you want. Luwat (talk) 06:29, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

An/I
I've mentioned you here .Bali ultimate (talk) 22:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Cebull's birthplace
Hi, Andrea, just a heads up in case you didn't notice. The official biography of Cebull (see the external link) says he was born in Billings, which is why the article said Billings. So, your change means we have conflicting sources. I'm leaving it alone because I suspect your local source is probably more accurate than the Federal Judicial Center's bio. Also, your source is an entertaining read.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You are welcome to footnote the discrepancy. As the law scholar in the cited article states, "he deserves to be judged on his entire long life and legal record, not just a glaring slipup." Too bad Wikipedia policies in this regard are ignored in favor of recentism and lack of proportional significance. Many editors prefer to linger over irrelevant details that get them riled up versus actual accomplishments. Also FYI, I prefer the handle Jokestress on here to distinguish from the bio about me. Thanks for your work on BLPs. Jokestress (talk) 22:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll try to remember about the handle. I don't intend to footnote it. I'll leave it to others more nit-picky than I (and there are a few).--Bbb23 (talk) 22:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

MOTD Needs You!
Hi there, Jokestress! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottoes. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottoes there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By Ankit Maity Talk Contribs  06:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC) via AWB

SlimVirgin
I'm still trying to do what I can about your biography. I've asked SlimVirgin if she can help. Luwat (talk) 03:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. When you recently edited The Perth Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Your biography
Hi Jokestress, I'm active on your biography again. You might want to comment on the talk page. Luwat (talk) 22:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

FYI
FYI: I mentioned you at AN/3RR BitterGrey (talk) 16:45, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Calabe1992 14:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. When you recently edited Lisa Lampanelli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TMZ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

AN/I on WLU's wikihounding
Just wanted to drop you a note that I mentioned you and WLU's negative BLP edits against you at AN/I. Since no unbiased editors or admins have commented, it will probably not go well. BitterGrey (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of When I'm‎


The article When I'm‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  04:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Out Out for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Out Out is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Out Out (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. When you recently edited Die Antwoord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Wole Soyinka
Hi Jokestress - Thanks for your barnstar for my changes to Soyinka articles - you know what it's like: I got interested and had to keep going from one to another. Still work to do, but thanks again.Parkwells (talk) 21:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Chernorizets Jacob?
Hi, Jokestress. According to what I found on Google Books, the person described lived in the 11th century. For instance, something called the Slavic Encyclopedia (Moscow: Olma Press, 2005) says that "He lived, according to the conjectures of Metropolitan Macarius, in the 70s-80s of the XI century". My Russian may be helpful here, although I do not possess any kind of knowledge about the subject myself, so obviously I have not done any research in the area. I am not sure where you found 6th-century dates - possibly looking at the claim I would let me tell you something more. Zloyvolsheb (talk) 22:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks like different monks. Jacob Chernorizets is also notable as an early Russian writer known for an ode to Vladimir the Great, who lived in the 10th-11th centuries and is known for his conversion of Russia in 988. Zloyvolsheb (talk) 23:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Dead link in article 'Lou Lumenick'
Hi. The article 'Lou Lumenick' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/gossip/2005/05/04/2005-05-04_francheti_gets_into_a_food_f.html This link is marked with Dead link in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!
 * You added this in September 2008.
 * The bot tested this link on 11 April, 13 April, 15 April, 18 April and today, but it never worked.
 * The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Zuccone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Naturalism and Museo dell'Opera del Duomo


 * Literary Encyclopedia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Censor


 * Richard Seed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to The Tech


 * Robert Holland (executive) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Ben Cohen


 * Rose Totino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Pillsbury


 * Valerian Fedorovich Pereverzev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Bobrov

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Thousand Island dressing and 'well-known'
Actually that is incorrect. 'Well-known' precedes a noun which it describes. 'Well known' is used for anything that contains 'by, as, etc.'. So the correction was no mistake. The proper usage has been discussed before. I actually discussed it before I made that edit as to whether or not it was correct. From previous discussion and consultation of its usage the proper usage is 'well known by' not 'well-known by'. The hyphen is used for 'well-known actress' because 'well known actress' is used as an adjective whereas the usage in the text was not being used as an adjective. That is the difference. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:12, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops, you're right. Sorry! Jokestress (talk) 19:47, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries. Doesn't hurt to double check or ask about those weird hyphen rules! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Biografies of living people
Hi. Encyclopedia is not victimization "even when the material is well-sourced." Please see Talk:Sun_Myung_Moon, respect the privacy of the living person, who dislikes very personal tragedies like deaths of children (neither carcrashes nor suicides nor get-revenge-memoirs of the daughter-in-law which is described in details on late Hyo Jin Moon-article, the same applies to Heung Jin Moon). Avoid demonizing: WP:ATTACK. Wikipedia is not a tabloid, besides, it's not so good for professional journalist as you to mention all of it above in Wikipedia from viewpoint of Journalism ethics and standards). Thanks Borovv (talk) 18:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard . Borovv (talk) 02:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Please do not threaten me with the possibility of being blocked as you did here. You are in the noticeboard for BLP violation, not me, so it's unapropriate of you to recommend me smth: i am flattered, thanks, but i dont need that - it's an administrator's jurisdiction to deside a block, not yours, not mine. Please follow a WP:COMMONSENSE: the last source actually does not say about adultery, it says about misunderstanding because of possible translation hardships and power misuse from court officials, but you put the misleading citation torn out of context. See WP:COI, WP:ATTACK and WP:NEEDSMOARDRAMA. DONT FORGET WP:BLP. Borovv (talk) 07:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Paul Jennings (union worker) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Westinghouse and James Madison High School


 * Un Jin Moon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Equestrian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Imbecile etc.
My problem with the stuff you mention is that it is secondary material, i.e. material about a topic, which is in itself original. I write stuff like that all the time, but not on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a tertiary source: it's supposed to sit on top of and collate existing secondary research. Imbecile was an article that involved a collation of points about imbecility that constituted an original attempt to give an overview of the area. I salute your attempts to do that, but that is a scholarly effort that should be performed somewhere else prior to the establishment of an area such that it is appropriate to have a Wikipedia article about it. I personally greatly disagree with the sentiment that 'something is better than nothing'. esperant 02:17, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your question, which I think allows me to clarify my complaint. You are quite right that an article must synthesise, in the sense of constructing a narrative structure in which to place information. This is where Wikipedia does have to be original in a sense. But the material basis for such a synthesis must be there in the form of an existing secondary literature. I don't believe such a literature exists in relation to imbecility. If it does, it was not cited in the article. Rather, the article was just a collection of some disparate references to imbecility in various pieces of literature. Now, I have no ideological opposition to stubs per se – that indeed would be quite odd. It's more that I don't agree that something is always better than nothing. The reason I don't agree with having a stub in this case is that I do not see any basis for it becoming something other than a stub – at least not until a larger secondary literature on the topic appears outside Wikipedia. If I thought imbecility were a topic of serious inquiry or debate outside Wikipedia, I would absolutely have left the stub as it was with its imperfections. esperant 12:41, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Dead link in article 'Louis Cornish'
Hi. The article 'Louis Cornish' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://www.uupcc.org/aboutus.htm#cornish
 * You added this in January 2007.

This link is marked with Dead link in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!
 * The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 03:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your referring to edits as "Crap"
The information is all sourced. You may not like the sourced information but that's really beside the point. TMZ is a legitimate source as she was interviewed on TMZ as shown here. And going to the article and referring to everyone's edits as crap is completely and totally unacceptable. Your editing conduct is disrespectful. 173.0.254.229 (talk) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Jodie Foster
Her article may need your skills to fix. I just read it for the first time and it seems like there is much in it that has issues with BLP articles. I won't mention the issues. It may be correct according to WP policy, but I would rather have a BLP editor more experienced than I look it over.--Canoe1967 (talk) 00:08, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Hyo Jin Moon
Sorry. My mistake to shortcut the process. I will paste the two articles together as I should have done. Borock (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Reply to your message
Hi Jokestress I do work for Save the Rhino but the reason for editing the Save the Rhino page was because we became aware that the information was very out of date and therefore misleading about us and I think people do read this page to find out about the organisation. The major changes were the Trustees/Patrons who have changed significantly. I did add in some more links and formatting but I appreciate that it needs to be monitored. If Wikipedia reverses the changes what should I do? In addition I tried to add links to the rhino species pages as the website appeared as an information source on some but not all of the rhino species pages. Perhaps we are not allowed to do this which I would understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.220.43.118 (talk) 12:44, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
For the great job you are doing. I keep running into pages you have edited and thinking "that's good..."

Guy Macon (talk) 02:17, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 


 * Thanks, Guy! Jokestress (talk) 03:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Venus-xtravaganza.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Venus-xtravaganza.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

OTRS review question
Hi! I noticed you in the edits on Clint Catalyst - you certainly have a lot of editing experience! The main picture on the article (which has an archived permission ticket) has been moved to Wikipedia Commons by a bot, and another image from the article was recently deleted. I'm picking my battles here, so I'm not worried about the second image, but as far as the main picture's status goes...I tried to fix it myself, but didn't understand - what needs to be done for it to go back to normal status? Right now, it's not showing up on the Facebook page anymore because of it. Thanks in advance! Feather Jonah (talk) 01:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I don't deal with the image people any more. It's a nightmare. I limit myself to adding images I made myself or images from before 1920. Jokestress (talk) 03:55, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited LeRoy Neiman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PGA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks...
I just wanted to say thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathnarg (talk • contribs) 06:40, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note and barnstar below! Jokestress (talk) 13:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your support. I appreciate it. --RJR3333 (talk) 03:34, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. It's difficult if not impossible to have a productive discussion about revisions and expansions in this topic area because of a handful of editors who think they WP:OWN these topics. I would urge you to be extremely cautious in interacting with any of them, as they will attempt to get you blocked or banned because you propose changes to "their" materials. Eysenck had some good materials about definitional problems surrounding this topic, which should be in the article. Please keep trying, but I recommend remaining civil and trying to reach consensus before adding materials to articles. You will find these editors to be very, very difficult to work with. That's why the article has had no substantive expansion or improvement in years. I don't want to see you get blocked or banned, which is a very real possibility. If you'd like help with something, let me know. We are trying to retain editors these days, as we are all allegedly here to build this into the sum of human knowledge. I don't want you to get discouraged or forced off the project because of this. Jokestress (talk) 03:52, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Could I ask you to review my contributions to the underage/pedo project. Because I've been accused of bias by both sides. One of the editors accused me of having a bias in favor of it being 18 (which I don't understand, because my position is actually that it should be 16) and two (Malke2010 and off2riorob/youreallycan) have accused me of having a bias that it should be 16. Do you see either bias in my edits?--RJR3333 (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The best thing you can do on these articles is to propose changes on the talk pages based on a citation in a published source. Your opinion on the definition is not relevant, as that's the problem with someone like Flyer22. We are supposed to represent the range of verifiable information from published sources. There is no one "true" answer, as our goal here is verifiability, not truth. Eysenck and others have pointed out that even among "experts," definitions are so variable that comparing studies is compromised. The terminology in this area is all over the place, and the best we can do is show the range of information in the published sources. Some of your edits appear to conflate a number of issues surrounding definitional axes of age, puberty, and consent. Stick to the sources to back up any proposed changes. Otherwise you will find this process to be more tedious than it will be otherwise. Jokestress (talk) 04:55, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * But could you answer my question about whether either of these biases are shown in my edits?--RJR3333 (talk) 06:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Several of your edits appear to constitute original research. Any changes to these controversial topics need to be quotations for reliable sources, with the exact citation formatted per our guidelines. I would not add anything on these topics unless you are quoting or carefully summarizing a previously published reliable source. If you have a specific diff you'd like me to review, please provide it. Jokestress (talk) 06:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, but what I'm asking about is bias. Do you see a bias?--RJR3333 (talk) 06:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I see some issues with how you present some definitions, some of which indicate you support certain views. If your edits only support one point of view or you actively seek to censor the full range of published information, I would classify that as a bias. I am reluctant to call out editors for bias unless there is a long pattern of problems, as is the case with someone like Flyer22. To me, it appears you are acting in good faith to expand and clarify materials, but some of your edits and arguments need to be more firmly grounded in policy. If you have a specific edit or series of edits you'd like me to review, please provide them. Jokestress (talk) 06:50, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Age_of_consent_reform&offset=&limit=500&action=history In the beginning off2riorob/youreallycan said "you appear to have a level of bias that is so opinionated as to be unable to contribute" to the age of consent/age of majority articles "in a neutral tone or in a manner beneficial to their content" because he said I was to biased in favor of the age of consent being 16 (at least that's what I think he meant based on my patters editing the article back in September 2011 and earlier but this other user says now that I'm to biased in favor of it being 18, which I think may partially have happened because I was being careful to avoid the earlier opposite bias. In the history of my editing this article do you detect either bias. --RJR3333 (talk) 07:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This is an excellent series of edits. This series appears to remove some historical context and is not as good. I do not see any bias in any of those edits, though. They all seem solidly based on references, though I did not look up each one. Jokestress (talk) 09:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * User:Flyer22 has threatened to topic ban me. What should I do? --RJR3333 (talk) 15:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't worry too much if you are being conscientious about working toward consensus and sticking to good sourcing. She resorts to things like sockpuppetry and other disruptions from time to time here. I recommend reading WP:COOL and and focusing solely on article content. Do not comment on her actions, don't try to "win" if she accuses you of some nonsense or brings up past conflicts. Her ongoing behavior will lead to another block for her or worse if she persists in bothering you. Ignore her as much as possible and focus on improving articles. If she starts to annoy you so much that you are tempted to respond in kind, take a break, work on other topics, etc. She won't be here forever. Jokestress (talk) 15:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If she does nominate me for a topic ban or report me for stalking her will you defend me and try to get other users to? --RJR3333 (talk) 19:01, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Not if you keep WP:CANVASsing everyone you can think of. Please stick with improving articles and don't sink to her level of sockpuppets and tattling and canvassing for support. You are making things worse. Jokestress (talk) 03:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. When you recently edited Practicing without a license, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pilot and Surveyor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks, Bearian! Jokestress (talk) 08:56, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Eat muhr brgrz

 * Thanks, Fasttimes68! Jokestress (talk) 03:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh my. I just read your user page.  Make that a soy burger.  Fasttimes68 (talk) 21:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * As long as it's real cheese, not vegan... Jokestress (talk) 21:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Chick-fil-A
Hi, your edit here combined the WSJ and Guidestar references, and now the convenience link is the same for both. I tried fixing it a couple of times without success. Can you give it a try? Thanks, 72Dino (talk) 22:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Those are bulleted because an editor said on the talk page the article had citation overkill. It's a standard style thing we do on those occasions. Jokestress (talk) 23:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No, the bullets are fine. It's just that when you click on the convenience link to the WSJ article it takes you to a PDF of the Form 990 instead of the article "Chick-fil-A's Long Christian Heritage." 72Dino (talk) 00:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ohhhh I see - fixed. Thanks! Jokestress (talk) 00:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Smiles for you!


TheGeneralUser (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding &#123;{subst:User:Cowman109/Smile2}} or &#123;{subst:User:Cowman109/Smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! Just came around to say Hi :). Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 21:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, buddy! See you around! Jokestress (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank You!
Dear Jokestress, I did not know about the rule and I promise to follow it,(I don't know to many but it only put in stuff I know or read). I don't know how to put refrences yet, but I look up that. The Gravity Falls info was from the Gravity Falls Wiki on the Wendy page. I am sorry and I wont put anything made-up or un-mention.
 * 'Hopes and praise'-Mattfan12059 :)
 * 'Hopes and prays'-Mattfan12059 :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattfan12059 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank You for Responding!
Thank you for responding! Have a good night! -Mattfan12059 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattfan12059 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

The Scissor Fits and The Oregon Song
Hi Jokestress :). I recently came across these two articles, The Scissor Fits and The Oregon Song and have found them to barely meet the Wikipedia stub requirements, although not fully. Both the articles have been on Wikipedia for almost 4 years since the end of 2008, but hardly any major article development or improvement has been done in both the articles. Also both the articles do not have any reliable sources and references, none so far. I am not sure if theses articles should be tagged for deletion. As you are an experienced editor, i have requested your help for article building, development and improvement if it is possible. I have also posted about this issue on Notability/Noticeboard. Regards! TheGeneralUser (talk) 12:46, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi TheGeneralUser. The former fails Notability (music) and the latter appears to be a hoax created by a sockpuppet of a banned user. I prodded both articles. Thanks! Jokestress (talk) 13:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey Jokestress! Thanks for your quick reply :). Looks like these articles can't be improved anyways will eventually get deleted as one already has. Good decision for tagging the articles, i would have probably also done the same, but i needed to review it from another experienced editor . Thank you for your help! TheGeneralUser (talk) 19:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference
I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.

We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Pregnancy from rape‎
I just want to say, you've done a very nice job cleaning up the article. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 06:13, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Mr. Vernon! Jokestress (talk) 06:27, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Seconded, excellent work! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Cirt! Jokestress (talk) 23:57, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You're most welcome, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Agh, so sorry - I don't know what I was thinking (considering I live and breathe this stuff anyway!)  Theo  polisme  :) 05:04, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks very much for your formatting and referencing help here at the article Donkey puncher! Glad to see we share a mutual interest in research of logging and steam power. ;) Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:38, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Cirt! I grew up near a rail line, and my home town had a factory with the last operational steam engine in its industry. Don't know too much beyond that, though. I came to the topic from a disambiguation page I created. Those things sound dangerous! Jokestress (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Heh, indeed. And great idea on the disambig. ;) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Glad you caught the double entendre... Jokestress (talk) 02:41, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. I'm a big fan of writing about freedom of speech and improving articles relating it and freedom of the press, just not necessarily what the speech itself might be describing in all instances. ;) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * That is exactly why I am here. Perhaps at some point soon we can examine some extremely controversial topics where moral panic reigns. Jokestress (talk) 04:02, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yip, that's it. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 10:12, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Bagatayam Waterfall
Hi Andrea :). Hope you're doing good! I recently came around this article Bagatayam Waterfall and i think it currently does not meet the basic minimum requirements for a Stub. The article only has a external link to flicker website of a picture and a external map link. There are no other reliable sources and references. If possible can you have a look at it and see what can be eventually done ? I believe your help will be invaluable . Regards. TheGeneralUser (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
 * If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Non-free rationale for File:Roy-smeck-book.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Roy-smeck-book.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

A Puppy for you! :)
 TheGeneralUser has given you a puppy! Puppies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your puppy must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a puppy, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Spread the goodness of puppies by adding {{subst:Puppy}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks a lot being a Faithful Companion and a Good Wikifriend :) TheGeneralUser (talk) 10:09, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, TheGeneralUser! Jokestress (talk) 20:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Editor review/TheGeneralUser (2) Your review is required and will be greatly appreciated :)
Hi Jokestress ! I have started my second editor review at Editor review/TheGeneralUser (2). I will be greatly delighted, thankful and valued to have your review for me regarding my editing and possible candidate for Adminship. As you are a experienced and long term Wikipedian so i have asked for your kind review. Take your time to review my editing and give the best review that you can :). Feel free to ask me any questions you would like to on the review page itself. It will be a great honor to have you review me for which I will truly feel appreciated and helpful! I always work to improve Wikipedia and make it a more better place to be for Everyone :). Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 20:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Do you plan to disclose your real name? I do not support anonymous/pseudonymous users obtaining enhanced editing privileges. Jokestress (talk) 20:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry for any misunderstanding Jokestress, but i am not asking to vote on an RfA. And i believe every user has the right to be Anonymous and they are not required to disclose their personal identity if they do not wish to do so as also given on Username policy. It's your wish if you want to review me or not and i am not forcing anyone to do it, it was just a kind request. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 20:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Buried Child (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to True West and Fool for Love


 * Curse of the Starving Class (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to True West and Fool for Love


 * Family Trilogy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to True West and Play


 * A Lie of the Mind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to True West


 * Fool for Love (play) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to True West


 * True West (play) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Fool for Love

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Classification of transsexuals
Hi, I've taken a pass to try fixing Classification of transsexuals and would appreciate someone more knowledgeable than I to have a look. You can see the former version with some of its biases in the revision history. Insomesia (talk) 01:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Mersenne's laws (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Tension and Proportion


 * Melvin Tumin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Segregation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nakoula Basseley Nakoula until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 21:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula
Do you really think that being a Democrat ia a) in any way relevant and b) part of a Criminal Career? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:25, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Contribution
Hello Jokestress (Andrea), I am Amadscientist (Mark). Thank you for your good faith contribution as seen with this dif however, the source you used does not support the claim being made. In order to return this information you must cite a reliable source that is making this claim outright without having to synthesis or assume the information. The citation given does not state a place of birth nor does it mention any immigration details.--Amadscientist (talk) 00:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email! If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia). Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
 * 2) Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code.  Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
 * 3) Create your account by entering the requested information.  (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
 * 4) You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID.  (The account is now active for 1 year).
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
 * Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
 * Show off your Questia access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Filming permit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Permit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Melvin Tumin
The Melvin Tumin article that you wrote was nominated by Yaris678 for the Did You Know? section of the main page. The article, however, does not meet one of the basic criteria, in that it is currently 1233 prose characters long, and the minimum requirement for DYK is 1500 prose characters, and that the article not be a stub.

Are you interested in expanding it? I've just also notified Yaris678 of the issue, but wanted to be sure you were aware this was happening. Please feel free to respond on the linked nomination template in the section header, and if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Benjamin scale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Sexualities


 * P.U. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Fu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, Northamerica1000! Jokestress (talk) 11:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Chris Brand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to General intelligence


 * François Peraldi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Sexuality


 * Homosexuality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to JAMA


 * Pansexuality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Reification


 * Polysexuality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Reifies


 * The Amazons (1917 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to William Marshall


 * The Amazons (play) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Thomas Reynolds


 * Vestryman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Parish council

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:09, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Michael C. Seto
Exactly what are you proposing in regard to this article? Any concrete suggestions? Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I found your message on my talk page and made some of the changes you suggested. GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:24, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Smiles
Hello there! I hope that last edit did not come across as snarky, I'm just concerned that the media is trying to blame the psychedelic 2C-I for this recent rash of deaths. As no tox screens, GC/MS results or autopsy reports have come out yet, it would be premature to say that Smiles was a synonym for 2C-I. Its composition, like many other bath salt blends, is still a mystery, and it is my belief that 2C-I doesn't need that kind of negative attention. I hope you understand where I'm coming from! =-) 173.230.25.201 (talk) 16:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The One Club


The article The One Club has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Promotional, as well non notable non-profit organization.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clarkcj12 (talk) 19:20, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * The One Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to David Abbott, Patrick Kelly, Mike Hughes and John Hegarty


 * Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Schedule I and Biologics


 * Cavalry (disambiguation) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Ellis


 * Synthetic cannabis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Schedule I


 * Valentine Blacker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Madras Cavalry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Linda Doucett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tales from the Crypt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Charles Tylor
Thanks for your article on Charles Tylor. Vernon White '''. . . Talk''' 16:34, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, Vernon39! Thanks for your improvements! Jokestress (talk) 17:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Melvin Tumin
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the style help at Donkey Punch (disambiguation), regarding the addition of the new article I've recently created, Donkey Punch (novel). Much appreciated, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem; it's a great article BTW! Jokestress (talk) 18:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I'm so glad you share my interest in hardboiled crime fiction relating to pugilism. :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:28, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Faggot (unit) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Bar, Rod, Earthworks, Stick and Pound


 * Jacob Faggot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Surveyor


 * List of organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as anti-gay hate groups (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Evangelist


 * Peter Mullen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to The Telegraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

PostEdit bug
Hey,

I can't manage to replicate that bug (no notice > edit > repeated notice on page load) in Chrome or Firefox. Can you maybe take a screencast, and perhaps try clearing everything one more time? Sorry for the pain in the butt, Steven Walling (WMF) &bull; talk   00:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Testing now. Jokestress (talk) 02:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

paraphilia article edit
Could you point me to the place in DRM-IV TR where they use the term normative? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.69.64.244 (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Please create an account. Normal means something different than normative, and normative is the correct word here. It's a matter of absolute (normal) vs. relative (normative). The term first came up in DSM III-R; I had the wrong version off the top of my head. Per Money's work, "DSM-III-R describes paraphilias as characterized by arousal in response to sexual objects or situations that are not part of normative arousal-activity patterns." Secondary source: Sexual Behavior: Problems and Management. (1993)  The DSM-5 draft maintains the normative/non-normative distinction present in previous versions: "This approach leaves intact the distinction between normative and non-normative sexual behavior, which could be important to researchers, but without automatically labeling non-normative sexual behavior as psychopathological." Normative is correct. Also, please create an account.  Jokestress (talk) 21:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeno's Pizza (Colombia), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cartagena and Pereira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Paula Broadwell
Sorry. :) Can't believe it was deleted before.  Your quick expanded version is much welcomed.--Oakshade (talk) 00:19, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Paua Broadwell Image
How is it replaceable? There isn't any at the current time. I am adding it back -- Camilo S&aacute;nchez Talk to me 03:42, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Careful adding info
To Paula Broadwell. You need sources for info like that - especially on such a high-profile page. Toddst1 (talk) 05:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for catching this. Toddst1 (talk) 05:33, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charmaine Yoest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheaton College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Jill Kelley
If you have time, please consider adding content from these sources to the Jill Kelley article. The most detailed ones are this and this. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Fred Humphreys
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Shelley Berman
Hi - I'm Shelley Berman's archivist, webmaster, and friend of ten years. I appreciate your interest in Shelley; however, I wanted to let you know that Shelley's date of birth and middle name have been incorrectly identified just about everywhere for many years. Shelley's actual date of birth is February 3, 1925 (not 1926). Also - Shelley has no middle name. I've made the corrections on his Wikipedia page.

Thanks -

Christopher Bay Webmaster shelleyberman.com 66.74.86.201 (talk) 16:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Doris Fleischman
Thanks for message, I see you have recreated the article in an acceptable form. A speedy deletion of Doris Fleischman you made is being discussed online. &mdash; it's usual to give a link to the discussion as well as notifying involved parties.

I notice that I omitted to give an edit summary, very unusual when I speedy delete, but an oversight for which I apologise. I should have put the heavily pov and non-neutral nature of the text as a reason. The article had been tagged by previous editors as "spam", "essay-like" and a "fansite", so I was hardly alone in viewing it as heavily promotional. Just to give a flavour, the opening paragraph read ''Most commonly known as the wife of Public Relations Pioneer Edward Bernays, Doris Fleischman was a pioneer in her own right. Both as a PR professional and as a career woman in a time of gender barriers, Fleischman overcame great boundaries to provide much of the background and initial support for tactics commonly used in PR today. While forgotten by many for a number of decades, recent PR scholars have started to bring her life and contribution into light for recognition.''

Her notability wasn't an issue, there was simply to point going to AfD for text which needed rewriting from scratch to be acceptable.

I'm not prepared to restore the deleted text in the article, but if you would like it in a sandbox of your choice, let me know. If you want me to contribute to the "discussion" mentioned in your message, can you let me know where it is? Thanks  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:53, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I would have thought it was for the prof to have explained to his students how to write a neutral, properly sourced academic article in any forum, instead of just sending them out to play on Wikipedia, and also to contact the admins concerned to discuss why their articles were being rejected. We have a whole class of students working with the Bird Project without this sort of problem, and although they sometimes get things wrong, they are interacting with established members to make useful contributions. The difference is that they were properly briefed by their tutor. What we have here is a lazy academic who hasn't bothered to read the rules himself, let alone tell his students what they need to do. Unfortunately, it's the students who lose out while he rants. I notice his concern and academic rigour doesn't extend to contacting me to find out what the problem was. I'm not losing any sleep over this, and you might do better contacting him to tell him what he is doing wrong than suggesting I change Wikipedia policy because some incompetent teacher is throwing a wobbly.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Whilst I may have been rude about the prof, I'm not aware that I have said anything inappropriate or offensive to you. I think you are wrong, but that's hardly an "attitude". If I've said anything that's upset you, I apologise. I simply don't think that allowing unfixable pov to go to AFD is appropriate just because someone is notable. Most of the pop groups who post here aren't notable, but some are. That doesn't mean that their press releases are going to avoid speedy deletion. As I say, I feel sorry for the students, but "well-intentioned" isn't the same as well-prepared. If you think I've handled this incorrectly, or I've been offensive to you, you could always go to ANI for arbitration. And the offer to post you the deleted text still holds, although I understand that it's the principle rather than the text that you are concerned about.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  08:29, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Association for Women in Communications
Hi. I noticed the red link on the Doris Fleischman article for the Association for Women in Communications, so I made a stub for the organization. Could you take a look and double check my work? Thanks ;) -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) (coi)  23:16, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks pretty good! Their membership numbers have halved since the mid-1990s, and they are currently managed by a nonprofit management firm with numerous clients via an office in Alexandria, Virginia. Their site has some more history stuff we could corroborate in other sources, but that's a nice start! Jokestress (talk) 23:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timur ruby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Donne's Holy Sonnets
Thanks for putting a table on the Holy Sonnets article. I've been hankering to do it, but never seem to get around to it. It's a great addition to the article.--ColonelHenry (talk) 01:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Appreciate it! The inconsistent numbering was complicating disambiguations. Several of those sonnets (especially Batter my heart) could use standalone articles at some point. Jokestress (talk) 02:28, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

David Wynn Miller edit out
jokestress Having never contributed only to find my contribution deleted in short order though factual in content. I feel a bit crest fallen. I will need to read your structure more closely if i chose to ever contribute again. most likely not. given not one word stuck. Do I need to have an article published then reference it? The federal court record is published an the public record a factual source to reference. a gold mine full of factual data. What am I not understanding? original thought.... I'm stuck with an excess of that. This man makes people his victims... a lot of people that trust him and do not know any better. He takes their money by sells false hope. He exploits that trust and there lack of knowledge. and harvested (his own words)them only for them to find out too late he has just made their wallet lighter and their position worse, because not enough truth is out there on the web with references to factual sources to draw the actual conclusions hidden from them by the gaff em in bull shit dog an pony show he sucker them into believing. pacer is such a place Not feeling very encouraged. my key pad does not have any tildes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A H BALONE (talk • contribs)


 * well ti nice to know your a real person anyway i getting your position and will try to approch it that way. it not about buying his "package" it more than that. I do not consider myself a writer per say. in fact writing is one of the more difficult tasks being disabled. this issue is about predatory abuse of one powers to persuade this is about people in tough spot with there property or home on the line perhaps their life saving entangled in same. About getting suckered into a well tailored fraud.About someone who make cannon fodder out of everyone who buys into the con. about guilty knowledge that all of these filings fail, go no were and leave there victims worse off in all cases. A charismatic, calculated predator. I'll figure out a way to get some articles written by providing an author for a publication to look into this charlatan. he may have had some valid point but this way and means tints all that was worth considering. and reduces it to the lever of a con. He doing perhaps 15-30k a week with this con.


 * Thanks for writing me back. Today was a fun day I look like Santa so i was in a photo shoot this morning for a ad in the local paper here in Honolulu. Comes out Thursday. It's a joyful time for me when the little ones stumbles across Santa (me) and they get all starry eyed. Then get the courage up to say Hi Santa. has me smiling all day. I also make a point of wearing a lot of red this time of year.--A H BALONE (talk) 23:23, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * The Epic of the Wheat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to The Pit


 * Victor Heerman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Animal Crackers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Jenni Rivera
Stop vandalizing the page of Jenni Rivera. Mexican authorities and a Mexican news anchor (https://twitter.com/lopezdoriga/status/277908722389499905) have confirmed her death. Wikipedia is a place for facts. Do your research before undoing other users edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24 biggest fan (talk • contribs) 23:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
for the barnstar!  Pinkadelica ♣  03:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Agrarian
Hello, Jokestress. I just wanted to let you know that I moved the disambiguation page you created at Agrarian to the title Agrarian (disambiguation), since Agrarianism appears to be the primary topic of the term "Agrarian." --R'n'B (call me Russ) 11:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
— ΛΧΣ  21  17:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hand-coding
Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Shemale NOTAFORUM
Hello! Cheers on the NOTAFORUM mention. In hindsight, your comment and edit were good ways of defusing an unwanted influence on the article without making a big deal about it. I felt like it was a bad idea to leave bad reasoning unaddressed on the talk page, since I've gotten an impression that the talk page can really set the tone for the article.

In this case I should have figured that the edit being discussed had been resolved, but could you direct me on a better guide to the line between talking and being a forum? It seems like, if bad reasoning is being provided for edits, showing the flaw in that reasoning is the Talking that a Talk page is made for. If the flaws in the reasoning are based on poor information on the subject matter, then it seems like that necessarily involves some forum-ing. WP:NOTAFORUM didn't seem very clear on what that line is.

Cheers. Triacylglyceride (talk) 06:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Iturbide, Nuevo León (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Linares and Galeana


 * Robyn Hilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Weather girl

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting
Sorry, I had to undo one of your edits because of--well, you'll see; could you redo it? Thanks. Drmies (talk) 03:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Drmies (talk) 03:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar
Why thank you kindly *blush*. I'll polish it up and put it on the shelf. :-)

Keep up the good work, and happy editing! -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:51, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Peter Lanza listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Peter Lanza. Since you had some involvement with the Peter Lanza redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 70.24.247.127 (talk) 06:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iantha, Missouri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tethys (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry
Hi, Sorry for the mistake I have done. I will be careful in future.

Thanks Mydreamsparrow (talk) 07:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi, Thank you so much for the photos comment, I hope you might have noticed my article contributions too. I will keep on adding my photos and articles to Wikipedia. I like photography and I am a photographer too. I am expecting your support in future.

Thanks

Mydreamsparrow (talk) 07:12, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

AIV report
I've blocked SilentFilm following your report, but please remember that AIV is for obvious vandalism only. ANI would have been a more appropriate place to report this. Danger High voltage! 16:59, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


 TheGeneralUser  (talk)  is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Hello Jokestress! Wishing you a very Happy Merry Christmas :)  TheGeneralUser  (talk)  11:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Histoire d'un crime (film)
Hi, I'm Skrelk. Jokestress, thanks for creating Histoire d'un crime (film)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page seems like it could be notable, but you haven't expressed that in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 07:22, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Belated thank you
Hi Jokestress, and thank for the barnstar here. I follow WP:NPP and start articles where needed, which is what happened here. Glad to be part of the team. --Shirt58 (talk) 13:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Silver Threads Among the Gold (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Silver Threads Among the Gold (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Altered Walter (talk) 21:06, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Pirate (sexual slang)
Hi, I'm Ana Bykova. Jokestress, thanks for creating Pirate (sexual slang)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for making a wiki page. Please refer to the tags added to find out how you could improve it. Best wishes, Anastasia Bykova (talk) 23:50, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Disambiguation link notification for December 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Annabelle Moore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Broadway


 * Dream of a Rarebit Fiend (1906 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Steeple


 * The Untold History of the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Revisionism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)