User talk:Jokestress/2014

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Helen Markley Miller
Thank you for your comments at Talk:Helen Markley Miller. Please find my response below your input. gidonb (talk) 23:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Nancy Christy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nancy Christy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nancy Christy & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AldezD (talk) 21:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Socialism (disambigation) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Socialism (disambigation). Since you had some involvement with the Socialism (disambigation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 07:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Apology for the ping
I know a post I made on the EL noticeboard probably pinged you and I know that you are unfortunately not able to respond, so just wanted to apologize for the ping. PaleAqua (talk) 02:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Adventures of Harry Nile


The article The Adventures of Harry Nile has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Credo
Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Question for Jokestress about GIDC article
Jokestress, I was looking into the history of the Gender Identity Disorder in Children article and saw that in July 2008, the number of views of the page went bezerk (from 30 the month before to 4953 in July with 4428 views on the day of July 8th, 2008). I am wondering if you can shed light on why. I could tell you more about why I am interested but will just leave the question for now.

Watkin Tudor Jones' Requested Move 2014 to Ninja
Hi. Big fan :) If you would be able to join in this conversation (Talk:Watkin_Tudor_Jones), I would be much oblidged. I am prepared to do all the heavy lifting, but could use the voice of an established editor like you. Thank you for your consideration. MarcusParker (talk) 22:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of James French (murderer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James French (murderer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James French (murderer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 19:38, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of James C. Sharf for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James C. Sharf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James C. Sharf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Holdek (talk) 06:31, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Green (soldier)


The article Richard Green (soldier) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SOLDIER, also WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Should be adequately covered by the article on the friendly fire incident.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of John F. Walsh Jr. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John F. Walsh Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John F. Walsh Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. postdlf (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Criminal lawyer


A tag has been placed on Criminal lawyer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

There is a duplicate DAB page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 (talk) 02:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Clarification motion
A case (Sexology) in which you were involved has been modified by which changed the wording  of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee -- S Philbrick (Talk)  20:29, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Rogan Experience for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Rogan Experience is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joe Rogan Experience until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TexasAndroid (talk) 22:54, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

August 9 1974 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect August 9 1974. Since you had some involvement with the August 9 1974 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)