User talk:Jokestress/2015

Proposed deletion of Vibeke Sæther


The article Vibeke Sæther has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 22:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Uzbek Ozbekistan listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Uzbek Ozbekistan. Since you had some involvement with the Uzbek Ozbekistan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 00:47, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

FunnyJunk.com listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect FunnyJunk.com. Since you had some involvement with the FunnyJunk.com redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SoledadKabocha (talk) 05:41, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chickenhead (song)


The article Chickenhead (song) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 12:40, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ziauddin Yousafzai for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ziauddin Yousafzai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ziauddin Yousafzai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luc Thériault (disambiguation)


The article Luc Thériault (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Per WP:2DABS; hatnote works better

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Luc Thériault (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luc Thériault (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Luc Thériault (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brycehughes (talk) 03:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Women's Mogul Skiing listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Women&. Since you had some involvement with the Women's Mogul Skiing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 23:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)