User talk:Joliee19/sandbox

Peer Review
Hi,

So from what I can see, the sources for this page are appropriate. However, I would add a few more since there are only a few there, to begin with. Everything in the article appears relevant, as do the sources you have. You are on the right track with fixing the sources for the Vatican and adding to the Classical Latin section, but there are also some maintenance things you could do. For example, the very first paragraph is a mess of too many links and too little information. So, you could add information or reduce the number of links (or both!) to only what is needed since it is very distracting. The other area you could fix is the language materials section. It has a confusing sentence that appears to be bullet points in sentence format. So either breaking it up into sentences or bullet pointing it should fix the issue. The "Latin Mass Society" link in the sources section, and where it repeats further down under 'course' leads to an access denied page. From the looks of it, it should be removed or somehow changed since it leads to a page where you have to be either a member or have access in general.

Addressing the link situation, I think you should go through and see if there are things linked that are either linked in more than one place the same or do not need to be linked and then fix it accordingly.

You seem to have balanced coverage, minus the sections that need adding to (i.e. Classical Latin and Literary Materials), and you should definitely be balanced once you add everything in. As far as out of date information goes, you should try to find maybe one "modern source" (so like the last 50-60 years) so that there is a comparison threshold available for those interested.

Liberatiam97 (talk) 02:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)