User talk:Jolies86

Image tagging for Image:Stephen Potts2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen Potts2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 14:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * (Sorry for the late reply, I wasn't online yesterday UTC) The problem with copyright when uploading an image is that Wikipedia has to be sure that the copyright licence is appropriate for reuse everywhere. "You have permission to use this image on Wikipedia" is unfortunately not good enough (which is what caused the warning; OrphanBot got slightly confused and gave a misleading, but technically correct, warning). If the author of the image is willing to licence it for anyone to use for any purpose, then you can specify the image copyright by writing PD-release on the image description page (leave the licence in the licence dropdown as 'none selected' if you're writing tags directly into the page like this); normally, people will put some conditions on the use of the image, so you can use a tag like ('the copyright holder allows the image to be freely redistributed, modified, used commercially and for any other purpose, provided that their authorship is attributed'), depending on what the conditions are. I suggest that you contact the image's copyright owner again to clarify what the licence is, and read Image copyright tags to determine the correct way to express what the copyright is for the image. If you need more help with the tagging, ask the copyright holder and let me know what the exact terms of the release of the image are (see commons:Commons:Licensing to determine what terms are acceptable for images on Wikipedia). Hope that helps! --ais523 08:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Stephen Potts(2).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen Potts(2).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Stephen_Pottssmall.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen_Pottssmall.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 21:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Stephen Pottssmall.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen Pottssmall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Stephen Potts.jpg


The file File:Stephen Potts.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)