User talk:Jomonkainakary

hi.. useful info...

Proposed deletion of Abraham Shaji John


The article Abraham Shaji John has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Fram (talk) 08:33, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Abraham Shaji John for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abraham Shaji John is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Abraham Shaji John until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daiyusha (talk) 18:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello Jomonkainakary. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Abraham Shaji John, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jomonkainakary. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Csgir (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Jomonkainakary (talk) 05:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Hi thanks for reviewing and considering it for permanent publication. I would like to declare that i dont have any monetary/influential stake in promoting Shaji Abraham. I considered this page creation as a tribute to his career and activities. I am still in process of finding more resources and references to his awards and recognitions. It would be very thankful, if moderators could take it forward for not deletion. I have been with wikipedia from 2011 with minor edits.. but this is my first full page creation. Kindly support