User talk:Jon21488

January 2011
Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did in the article DZBB-AM. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 03:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220.101 User talk:220.101.28.25\ 10:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

"Proceeded"
Hi. This is a reminder regarding your edit to December 2010 lunar eclipse. Remember that when event A occurs before event B, then event B follows event A, and in this circumstance event A also precedes event B. Please keep this in mind when making future edits to articles. Thanks. ~ A H  1 (TCU) 03:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pangunahing Balita


A tag has been placed on Pangunahing Balita requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  D u s t i *poke* 08:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pangunahing Balita


The article Pangunahing Balita has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not enough context to identify the subject or establish further notability other than a "News Station". No sources or references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  D u s t i *poke* 08:15, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Number of episodes aired
Are you sure that that is the EXACT number of episodes aired on every article that you edit? It seems that you are just multiplying the number of weekdays in a year and add them up. Also, you are using the section incorrectly. It should be the number of episodes as of the LAST DAY it aired, not from its pilot date. -WayKurat (talk) 11:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation edits
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Canterbury Television. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- azumanga (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Solar eclipses on the Moon
What was the point of creating this article? Anything covered here can be included in the existing lunar eclipse article. --TimL (talk) 14:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Solar eclipses on the Moon


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Solar eclipses on the Moon. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Lunar eclipse. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Lunar eclipse - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. TimL (talk)

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to 1987 in the Philippines, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. MrChupon (talk) 04:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited 1987 in Philippine television, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages That's Entertainment and Ang Panday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 07:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * This is in reference to you creating the hoax article [[Bombing of Sapporo in World War II] (something which never happened: ), and the largely fictional [[United States Navy attacks on Hokkaido and northern Honshu]] (which did happen, but not in anything much like the way you described it). I presume that you're the person who's been repeatedly adding these claims to the Air raids on Japan article. Please stop, or you will be blocked for an indefinite period. Nick-D (talk) 07:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, please do not simultaneously edit using an IP account as you were doing via Nick-D (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Loveli-Ness


The article Loveli-Ness has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established by enough sources. I found one in print but it mentions the show in passing, not describing it in detail. Binksternet (talk) 14:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Binksternet (talk) 14:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pambansang Balita Ala-Una


The article Pambansang Balita Ala-Una has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * fails notability, no in-depth coverage found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 08:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Pangunahing Balita for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pangunahing Balita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pangunahing Balita until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rdp060707&#124;talk 10:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of PEP (People, Events and Places) Talk


The article PEP (People, Events and Places) Talk has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since January"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  13:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of PEP (People, Events and Places) Talk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PEP (People, Events and Places) Talk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PEP (People, Events and Places) Talk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Donald D23  talk to me  13:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)