User talk:JonV123

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Debate Celebrate.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Debate Celebrate.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Debate Celebrate.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Debate Celebrate.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MGA73 (talk) 12:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chesterton High School
Hi JonV123. First off, a belated welcome to Wikipedia! Next, about your submission. It seems a number of different users including:

Also, just recently, the IP address named 50.104.3.55 posted a message to my talk page regarding your submission. I sent a message to Reedmjstn about the submission because I thought he created the article. However, looking back, I notice a large number of people contributed to the article, and you were the one who created it. Usually, it's frowned upon when one editor barges in on another user's work. Also, you are only limited to one account and one account cannot represent a group of people, see Sock puppetry for more information. So my questions to you are: Are these accounts yours? If not, do you permit the other editors editing your submission, and subsequently submitting the article for you? Again, welcome! Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Because you didn't respond, I went ahead and accepted the article. You can now find it at Chesterton High School. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Kill Order


The article The Kill Order has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTBOOK applies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dog six (talk) 04:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Kill Order


The article The Kill Order has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable book. No independent refs. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of The Kill Order for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Kill Order is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Kill Order until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dog six (talk) 14:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)