User talk:Jon Furston

text test

Global warming
I notice that you've made two distinct quite controversial edits to this article in the space of one hour. Please slow down and try to explain why you think these edits need to be made. If you get consensus for an edit, it is likely to stay in the article; if not, it will not stay. With this in mind, discussion is better than reckless editing. --TS 06:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Scibaby Sock
I will assume good faith just far enough to give you a little explanation. Scibaby is an banned individual, probably a teenager, who creates a huge number of accounts, edits a couple of other places, often leaves the accounts "sleeping" and then tries to start a fight on Global Warming articles. Its very dull, and there have been a couple of attacks a day for perhaps a year now. This repeated pattern makes it a bit harder to observe all the usual courtesies. Scibaby has done this with a very large number of accounts and accounts which fit the pattern of a few tinkering edits and then hit global warming with silly vandalising edits tend to get blocked on sight. There is also a tendency to try to waste admin time by starting insincere discussions ("Trolling"). You fit the pattern. You have hardly invested much time on this account, if you are genuinely not Scibaby I suggest you start a new account and try to concentrate on positive edits rather than rushing into contraversial areas with low quality edits.