User talk:Jonas Henriksson

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! nonsense ferret  02:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * In response to your query on my talk page - a link to the journal's own website is insufficient for two very good reasons: 1. It is an primary source and not independent, so is not appropriate independent verification of anything. 2. It cannot add anything to building a case to establish the journal is "notable" and thus appropriate for inclusion in wikipedia per the terms of WP:GNG,supplemented by WP:CORP, and by analogy you might also find WP:ACADEMIC worth a quick read. Basically the article about the academic journal will be accepted if it appears to present a reasonable case that the journal is recognised as authoritative, or contributes significantly to this field by reference to what other academics have written about it.  Such a case for notability can't be built on what the journal says about itself.  Journals that are very new, such that they have as yet had little significant coverage in reliable independent sources may find that it is too soon for inclusion.
 * I hope you will understand that to accept the article in its current form is pointless as it would be quickly nominated for deletion in mainspace. Much better to reject and allow you to make improvements so that when it is resubmitted it can be accepted and stay there --nonsense  ferret  13:16, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply and the detail added to the article, this has now been accepted. --nonsense ferret  18:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Nanoscale Journal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! nonsense ferret  18:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for July 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sweden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Husby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of Sweden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SCB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crimean crisis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)