User talk:Jonatha07

Levels of Communication 1) INTRAPERSONAL COMMUNICATION- is language use or thought internal to the communicator. Intrapersonal communication is the active internal involvement of the individual in symbolic processing of messages. The individual becomes his or her own sender and receiver, providing feedback to him or herself in an ongoing internal process. It can be useful to envision intrapersonal communication occurring in the mind of the individual in a model which contains a sender, receiver, and feedback loop. Although successful communication is generally defined as being between two or more individuals, issues concerning the useful nature of communicating with oneself and problems concerning communication with non-sentient entities such as computers have made some argue that this definition is too narrow. In Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry, Jurgen Ruesch and Gregory Bateson argue that intrapersonal communication is indeed a special case of interpersonal communication, as "dialogue is the foundation for all discourse." Intrapersonal communication can encompass: •	Day-dreaming •	Nocturnal dreaming, including and especially lucid dreaming •	Speaking aloud (talking to oneself), reading aloud, repeating what one hears; the additional activities of speaking and hearing (in the third case of hearing again) what one thinks, reads or hears may increase concentration and retention. This is considered normal, and the extent to which it occurs varies from person to person. The time when there should be concern is when talking to oneself occurs outside of socially acceptable situations.[1] •	Writing (by hand, or with a wordprocessor, etc.) one's thoughts or observations: the additional activities, on top of thinking, of writing and reading back may again increase self-understanding ("How do I know what I mean until I see what I say?") and concentration. It aids ordering one's thoughts; in addition it produces a record that can be used later again. Copying text to aid memorizing also falls in this category. •	Making gestures while thinking: the additional activity, on top of thinking, of body motions, may again increase concentration, assist in problem solving, and assist memory. •	Sense-making (see Karl Weick) e.g. interpreting maps, texts, signs, and symbols •	Interpreting non-verbal communication (see Albert Mehrabian) e.g. gestures, eye contact •	Communication between body parts; e.g. "My stomach is telling me it's time for lunch."

2.)INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION- Interpersonal communication is defined by communication scholars in numerous ways, though most definitions involve participants who are interdependent on one another, have a shared history. Communication channels are the medium chosen to convey the message from sender to receiver. Communication channels can be categorized into two main categories: Direct and Indirect channels of communication. Direct channels are those that are obvious and can be easily recognized by the receiver. They are also under direct control of the sender. In this category are the verbal and non-verbal channels of communication. Verbal communication channels are those that use words in some manner, such as written communication or spoken communication. Non-verbal communication channels are those that do not require silly words, such as certain overt facial expressions, controllable body movements (such as that made by a traffic police to control traffic at an intersection), color (red for danger, green means go etc), sound (sirens, alarms etc.). Indirect channels are those channels that are usually recognized subliminally or subconsciously by the receiver, and not under direct control of the sender. This includes kinesics or body language, that reflects the inner emotions and motivations rather than the actual delivered message. It also includes such vague terms as "gut feeling", "hunches" or "premonitions". Channels means mode of communicating the messages. Participants is the communicators who are both senders and receivers. Context refers to the interrelated condition of communication. It consists of such factors as: physical Milieu Balance of interpersonal communication The Johari window model focuses on the balance of interpersonal communication. Interpersonal communication encompasses: •	Speech communication •	Nonverbal communication •	Unconscious communication •	summarizing •	paraphrasing •	listening •	questioning •	Initiating: Declaring one's conversational intent and inviting consent from one's prospective conversation partner •	Turn-taking: Managing the flow of information back and forth between partners in a conversation by alternating roles of speaker and listener

Having good interpersonal communication skills support such processes as: •	parenting •	intimate relationship •	management •	selling •	counseling •	coaching •	mentoring and co-mentoring, which is mentoring in groups •	conflict management

Interpersonal communication is the subject of a number of disciplines in the field of psychology, notably Transactional analysis.

3.) GROUP COMMUNICATION- refers to the nature of communication that occurs in groups that are between 3 and 12 individuals. Small group communication generally takes place in a context that mixes interpersonal communication interactions with social clustering.

4.) PUBLIC COMMUNICATION- It's at the heart of our economy, society, and politics. Studios use it to promote their films. Politicians use it to get elected. Businesses use it to burnish their image. Advocates use it to promote social causes. It's a field built on ideas and images, persuasion and information, strategy and tactics. No policy or product can succeed without a smart message targeted to the right audience in creative and innovative ways.

by: Jonathan Gonzales

NAG IISA PART 2

[chorus] halina’t pumasok ka saking puso nang malaman mo ang totoo [nag-iisa] na ikaw ang nag-ani ng tinanim kong pag-suyo puso koy di ko na kayang pigilan ikaw ang sanhi ng pagtibok [nag-iisa] sabihin mo, na mahal mo rin ako akala ko hanggang sulyap at parinig na lang ang pag-tingin at pag-hanga ko sayo.. Akala ko masungit ka ,ung tipong di kayang tablan ng pangbobola ko. Labi ko ay nabigla,na sinabing lubha kitang minamahal at sinisinta.. [chorus] halina’t pumasok ka saking puso nang malaman mo ang totoo [nag-iisa] na ikaw ang nag-ani ng tinanim kong pag-suyo puso koy di ko na kayang pigilan ikaw ang sanhi ng pagtibok [nag-iisa] sabihin mo, na mahal mo rin ako akala ko hanggan sa panaginip nalang na maging tayong dalawa ngunit puso mo sa akin ay nahulog din at yan masasabi kong langit na ang nagpasya, na tayong dalawa. Ang mga anghel na dapat mag-tagpo Sabihin mo sakin na ako lamang ang nilalaman ng puso at ako nag hari ,at nag bukas ng yong pinto upang muli na ikaw ay umibig magtiwalang di magbibigo. Di ko sasayangin ang pagibig mong ito.. Puso ko’y di ko na kayang pigilan ikaw ang sanhi ng pag tibok [nag iisa] sabhin mo, na mahal mo din ako..

by: Jonathan G. Gonzales

Nomination of Levels of communication for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Levels of communication is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Levels of communication until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Morning Sunshine (talk) 03:20, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NAG IISA PART 2


A tag has been placed on NAG IISA PART 2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morning Sunshine (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi there. I've moved the article onto your user page so you can develop it a bit--right now it's simply incomprehensible to the average reader. You should take a look at this page for some tips on how articles should be written. Have fun!  Swarm   X 03:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jonathan Gallardo Gonzales
A tag has been placed on Jonathan Gallardo Gonzales, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —C.Fred (talk) 03:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)